<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-F7J7O8EB/d22b9612-875b-4e42-b031-2d81888921d3/PDF"><dcterms:extent>642 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-F7J7O8EB/42d08ec7-eaed-4733-b58c-6760157d74a1/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>59 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-F7J7O8EB"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Dragoš, Srečo</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:48</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:jubilejna</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 1242-1263, 1388-1389</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:3725157</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-F7J7O8EB</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Catholicism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Cerkev</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Church</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Corporativism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Democracy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Demokracija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Katolicizem</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Korporativizem</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Samoupravljanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Self-management</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Social policy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Social state</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Socialna država</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Socialna politika</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">welfare state</dc:subject><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q828395" /><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Demokratičnost demokracije in alternative?|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Questions related to the democratic system and its alternatives are as relevant today as they were before the Second World War. The attitude of the major pre-war competitive political blocs in the Slovenian territory towards democracy remained virtually unchanged: it was pragmatic, instrumentalised and reserved. In the plethora of pre-war corporate models of social regulation three models are particularly advanced: Gosar's model, Jeraj's model and the model of The Slovenian Workers Federation. The comparison of these three models yields conclusions, which carry important implications for the current issues related to the question mentioned in the title. In the final section of the article, the conclusions (constructs) are divided into four types, which can be expressed as combinations of political problems and solutions typical of the Slovenian past and present times</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Vprašanja v zvezi z demokratičnim sistemom in njegovimi alternativami niso danes nič manj aktualna, kot so bila v času pred drugo svetovno vojno. Pri takratnih dveh najpomembnejših kompetitivnih političnih blokih na Slovenskem je odnos do demokracije ostajal vseskozi bistveno enak: pragmatičen, instrumentaliziran in rezerviran. V množici predvojnih korporativnih modelov družbene regulacije izstopajo po svoji razvitosti trije: Gosarjev, Jerajev in model Slovenske delavske zveze. Z njihovo primerjavo pridemo do ugotovitev, ki so pomembne tudi za današnje zadrege z naslovnim vprašanjem. Te ugotovitve (konstrukte) avtor v sklepnem delu prispevka razvrsti v štiri tipe. Gre za kombinacije političnih problemov z rešitvami, značilnimi za slovensko preteklost in sedanjost</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-F7J7O8EB"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-F7J7O8EB" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-F7J7O8EB/d22b9612-875b-4e42-b031-2d81888921d3/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-F7J7O8EB/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-F7J7O8EB" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>