131 KB32 KB200820252010Plauštajner, Konradštevilka:1str. 37-48COBISSID:11289169ISSN:1855-5861URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-F68FI9X0slGV ZaložbaPravni letopisodvetnikipravdni postopekprocesno pravosodiščasodnikiPosledice zaostrenih obveznosti v civilnem postopku| (stališče odvetnika)|The author presents the effects of the amendments to the Civil Procedure Act adopted in 2008 from the aspect of a practicing attorney. The novelties that support the concentration and the speedy conduct of the civil procedure and at the same time strengthen the quality of the judge's decision should be welcomed. Some other novelties, however, such as rejection of a claim if the power of attorney has not been submitted in writing or if an attorneyćs written submission is incomplete, are too rigorous, unnecessary and harmful to the client's interest. Precluding the facts and evidence should only be possible after a judge has fulfilled his duty with regard to the substantive conduct of the proceedingsAvtor kot odvetnik podaja oceno vpliva sprememb Zakona o pravdnem postopku iz leta 2008. Kot pozitivne ocenjuje tiste novosti, ki koristijo strnjenosti in hitrosti postopka in krepijo kakovost sodnikove odločitve. Nekatere druge novosti, kot so zavrženje tožbe, če odvetnik ni predložil pooblastila, ali zavrženje njegove nepopolne vloge, so prestroge, nepotrebne in predvsem v škodo strank. Prekluzije prepozno navedenih dejstev in dokazov ni mogoče uveljavljati, če sodnik ne opravi svoje zakonske dolžnosti v okviru materialnega pravdnega varstvaTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaInštitut za primerjalno pravo pri Pravni fakulteti v Ljubljani IPP-PF