301 KB31 KB194820252017Tomazin, TanjaVladušić, Slobodanštevilka:1letnik:65str. 141-150ISSN:0350-6894COBISSID:63786594URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-F30GWZO3slSlavistično društvo SlovenijeSlavistična revijaAndrić, Ivo, 1892-1975avtopoetikahistoryKiš, Danilo, 1935-1989poetikaprimerjalne študijesrbska književnostsrbski pisateljizgodbazgodovinaKiš in Andrić - možna poetološka vzporednica|The author's point of departure is the observation that both Andrić and Kiš use historical documents in the process of their writing, although they achieve that in different ways. This difference is examined in the context of a monumental challenge to which both authors had to respond, i.e., the dominance of information over the story. The poetological reaction to this challenge is different for each author, but a certain position is common to both of them: they both differentiate between the officially accepted history, which they equate with fiction, and non-accepted knowledge about the past. They believe that literature has the power to gather elements of this non-accepted knowledge about the past and confront the official history with themTemeljno izhodišče razprave je ugotovitev, da pri ustvarjanju književnih del tako Andrić kot Kiš uporabljata zgodovinske dokumente, vendar to počneta na dva različna načina. To različnost obravnavamo v kontekstu epohalnega izziva, na katerega morata odgovoriti oba avtorja, to pa je premoč informacije nad zgodbo. Medtem ko je poetološka reakcija na ta izziv pri obeh avtorjih različna, pa jima je skupno to, da razlikujeta med uradno priznano zgodovino, ki jo istovetita s fikcijo, in nepriznanim védenjem o preteklosti. Verjameta, da ima književnost to moč, da zbere elemente tega nepriznanega védenja o preteklosti in z njimi sooči unificirano zgodovinoTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlavistično društvo Slovenije