<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-EWZJDEUU/64a12f54-3700-4232-93c6-ed3efea12eab/PDF"><dcterms:extent>498 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-EWZJDEUU/6acec80a-ffcd-49a4-907f-1dc3d1eef65c/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>84 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2015-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2015</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-EWZJDEUU"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-M1DCQYMN" /><dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Bek, Dominika</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hanc, Jakub</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:16</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 25-54</dc:format><dc:identifier>DOI:10.18690/mls.16.1.25-54.2023</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:211153155</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:2463-7955</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-EWZJDEUU</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">University of Maribor Press</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Medicine, law &amp; society</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">človekove pravice</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">mediacija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">mediation</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">medical chamber</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pacienti</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">physician</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Poljska</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">professional liability</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">restorative justice</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">zdravniki</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">zdravstvene napake</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2015-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">On the insufficiencies of the current legislative regime regarding physician-patient mediation in the professional liability of physicians| a critical analysis of the Polish solution|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The article presents a critical opinion on physician-patient mediation conducted in the context of proceedings on the professional liability of physicians. The starting point is the Act on Medical Chambers, which provides for the possibility of conducting a mediation between the accused physician and the aggrieved patient. This regulation is unique in the region. Its specific measures, such as, for example, the choice of a mediator among physicians, have undergone a critical assessment in the literature. As a rule, the need for the functioning of mediation in the context of professional liability is not called into question. However, a thorough analysis of the assumptions of mediation and restorative justice and the function of professional liability of physicians suggests going a step further. Although the physician-patient conflict certainly requires conciliatory solutions, it seems that the disciplinary regime does not provide an adequate foundation for agreement because it is unable to secure the aggrieved person’s interests</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Članek predstavlja kritično mnenje o mediaciji med zdravnikom in pacientom, ki poteka v okviru postopkov o poklicni odgovornosti zdravnikov. Izhodišče je Zakon o zdravniški zbornici, ki predvideva možnost izvajanja mediacije med obtoženim zdravnikom in oškodovanim pacientom. Ta predpis je edinstven v regiji. Njegovi specifični ukrepi, kot je na primer izbira mediatorja med zdravniki, so bili v literaturi deležni kritične ocene. Potreba po delovanju mediacije v okviru poklicne odgovornosti praviloma ni postavljena pod vprašaj. Vendar pa temeljita analiza predpostavk mediacije in restorativne pravičnosti ter delovanja poklicne odgovornosti zdravnikov nakazuje, da naj se gre korak naprej. Čeprav spor med zdravnikom in pacientom vsekakor zahteva spravne rešitve, se zdi, da disciplinska ureditev ne daje ustrezne podlage za dogovor, saj ne more zavarovati interesov oškodovanca</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-EWZJDEUU"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-EWZJDEUU" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-EWZJDEUU/64a12f54-3700-4232-93c6-ed3efea12eab/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Mariboru, Pravna fakulteta</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-EWZJDEUU/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-EWZJDEUU" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>