<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-E9SKOOBH/7becd34f-c1fd-4c64-b7ef-ef914455068a/PDF"><dcterms:extent>675 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-E9SKOOBH/e66521a9-06a3-44d2-a556-d1e5b396613e/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>52 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-E9SKOOBH"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Milosavljevič, Marko</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:49</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 112-130, 232</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:31097437</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-E9SKOOBH</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Analiza vsebine</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Content analysis (Communication)</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Hate speech</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Journalism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">mass media</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">množični mediji</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Novinarstvo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Regulacija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Regulation</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Slovenia</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Slovenija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Sovražni govor</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Spletni portali</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Web portals</dc:subject><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q653347" /><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Regulacija in percepcija sovražnega govora| analiza dokumentov in odnosa urednikov spletnih portalov|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The article analyses the way hate speech is interpreted by editors as key gatekeepers and definers of the editorial policy of certain media. Related to this is the question of how hate speech is defined in regulatory and self-regulatory terms and documents. The analysis is based on two methods: first an analysis of key documents that form the framework of Slovenian media and, second, in-depth interviews with editors of selected Slovenian (online) media. We found that certain editors do not differentiate between hate speech and defamatory speech and other forms of controversial or banned speech. These perceptions reveal a lack of knowledge regarding the legal framework of hate speech. The analysis also shows that editors of Slovenian online media donot have a precise regulatory and self-regulatory system and thus many decisions regarding hate speech are arbitrary</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Članek predstavlja problem ustreznega poznavanja regulacijskega in samoregulacijskega okvira sovražnega govora v slovenskih medijih, in sicer na primeru urednikov spletnih medijev kot odbirateljev. Uporabljeni sta dve metodi, in sicer analiza ključnih dokumentov in poglobljeni polstrukturirani intervjuji z izbranimi uredniki slovenskih množičnih medijev. Ugotovitve analize kažejo, da določeni uredniki ne ločujejo med sovražnim govorom in razžalitvami ali kletvicami, kar kaže na slabo poznavanje pravnega okvira, pa tudi samega pojma sovražni govor. Analiza tudi kaže, da to lahko vodi v specifične odločitve urednikov in da so s tem odločitve o sovražnem govoru pogosto prepuščene individualni percepciji urednika</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-E9SKOOBH"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-E9SKOOBH" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-E9SKOOBH/7becd34f-c1fd-4c64-b7ef-ef914455068a/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-E9SKOOBH/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-E9SKOOBH" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>