<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-DXLK5KRH</identifier><date>2017</date><creator>Kolnhofer-Derecskei, Anita</creator><relation>documents/doc/D/URN_NBN_SI_doc-DXLK5KRH_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/D/URN_NBN_SI_doc-DXLK5KRH_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">4</format><format format_type="volume">50</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 299-313</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1318-5454</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">298459904</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-DXLK5KRH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moderna organizacija</publisher><source>Organizacija (Kranj)</source><rights>InC</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">dejavniki tveganja</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">lastnina</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">lastninska pravica</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">odločanje</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">paradoks</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">teorija odločitev</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">tveganje</subject><title>or how endowment effect influences our decision in case of allias paradox?</title><title>The indifferent, the good Samaritan, the brave and the agent in Allais paradox situation</title></Record>