{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-DTZOUI3N/2dd4773ae1-40aae334-f1-76c22a0e536-7/PDF","dcterms:extent":"130 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-DTZOUI3N/3e2cda50-1632-4472-a61f-ee7a34d0a773/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"31 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-DTZOUI3N","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-2XUGOISV"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Podjetje in delo"}],"dcterms:issued":"2020","dc:creator":"Weingerl, Petra","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:46"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:6/7"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 1195-1205"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0353-6521","COBISSID_HOST:44136195","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-DTZOUI3N"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Lexpera"},"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Novosti glede odškodninske odgovornosti za umetno inteligenco|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Recently, EU institutions are very active in setting the political and legal framework for regulating liability for artificial intelligence. The framework for liability in the Union is based on two pillars, namely the parallel application of Directive 85/374 on product liability, which harmonised the liability of the manufacturer of defective products, and other (non-harmonised) national liability regimes. The question that arises is whether the existing regulation is suitable for the challenges posed by the use of artificial intelligence. The European Commission and the European Parliament agree that certain adjustments to existing legislation are needed. To this end, this paper will provide an overview of the salient issues and proposed solutions in the White Paper on Artificial Intelligence and in the Draft Report with Recommendations to the Commission on the Civil Liability Regulation for Artificial Intelligence. In addition to possible amendments to Directive 85/374, an enactment of a new regulation governing specific aspects of liability relating to artificial intelligence is proposed. The focus of EU institutions is on the distinction between low-risk and high-risk applications. While strict liability is proposed for high-risk applications, the question of the adequacy of fault liability with a possible reversal of the burden of proof arises for non-high-risk applications. While any amendments to Directive 85/374 will need to be implemented in the Slovenian legal order, most likely through amendments to the Consumer Protection Act, the proposed new regulation will be applied directly, without implementing measures. The changes will therefore affect the civil liability regime in Slovenia, as they will further fragment and Europeanise it"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Institucije EU so v tem obdobju zelo aktivne glede določanja političnega in pravnega okvira za urejanje uporabe umetne inteligence, vključno z vidiki odškodninske odgovornosti. Okviri odškodninske odgovornosti v Uniji se opirajo na dva stebra, in sicer na vzporedno uporabo Direktive 85/374 o odgovornosti za proizvode, ki je harmonizirala odgovornost proizvajalca proizvodov z napako, in (neharmoniziranih) nacionalnih pravil s področja odškodninskega prava. Vprašanje, ki se postavlja, je, ali je obstoječa ureditev primerna za izzive, ki jih prinaša uporaba umetne inteligence. Evropska komisija in Evropski parlament se strinjata, da so določene prilagoditve obstoječe zakonodaje potrebne. V povezavi s tem prispevek poda pregled odprtih vprašanj in predlaganih novosti v Beli knjigi o umetni inteligenci ter v Osnutku poročila s priporočili Komisiji o ureditvi civilne odgovornosti za področje umetne inteligence. Poleg morebitnih sprememb Direktive 85/374 se predlaga nova uredba, ki bi uvedla nov koncept odgovornosti glede na vrsto tveganja. Medtem ko se za sisteme umetne inteligence z visokim tveganjem predlaga objektivna odgovornost za škodo, se za druge sisteme odpira vprašanje primernosti krivdne odgovornosti z morebitnim obrnjenim dokaznim bremenom, ki bi oškodovancem olajšalo uveljavljanje odškodninskih zahtevkov. Morebitne spremembe Direktive 85/374 bi bilo treba implementirati v slovenski pravni red, najverjetneje skozi spremembe Zakona o varstvu potrošnikov, predlagana nova uredba pa bi se uporabljala neposredno, brez implementacijskih ukrepov. Spremembe bodo torej vplivale na režim odškodninskega prava v Sloveniji, saj ga bodo dodatno fragmentirale in evropeizirale"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-DTZOUI3N","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-DTZOUI3N"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-DTZOUI3N/2dd4773ae1-40aae334-f1-76c22a0e536-7/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-DTZOUI3N/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-DTZOUI3N"}}}}