198 KB57 KB199020252017Luthar, Bredaštevilka:45str. 153-168ISSN:0353-6777COBISSID_HOST:34711645URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-D5JXJQ32slInštitut za slovensko izseljenstvoDve domoviniAnaliza diskurzaBegunciDiscourse analysisInterviewsIntervjujiRefugeesTelevision broadcasting of newsTelevizijske informativne oddajeBegunci in odmevi| epistemologija konvencij|In this article I investigate the representation of the "refugee problem" in the Odmevi current affairs program on Slovenian national TV. I aim to explore how conventional, naturalized codes and neutralism as a constitutive element of professional self-presentation in political journalism determined the treatment of the "refugee problem". In this context, I analyze the selection of external or "accessed" voices in the Odmevi studio interview, the discursive framing of interviewees and their placement into the show's narrative. The main findings are a) that the selection and b) the discursive treatment of studio guests in Odmevi's interviews caused or rather enabled the debate on the "refugee problem" to be narrowed to the sphere of legitimate controversy represented by partisan politics. The selection and treatment of accessed voices (interviewees and guests) created the so-called opinion or discursive tunnel, which consequently led to the complete symbolical marginalization of all views that fell outside the parliamentary mainstream and its interests, and hence to treating the problem as a mere sequence of eventsAvtorica v članku obravnava "begunsko problematiko" v oddaji Odmevi na slovenski javni televiziji. Zanima jo, kako konvencionalna naturalizirana pravila novinarske prakse in uprizarjanje nevtralizma kot sestavnega dela profesionalne samopredstave političnega novinarstva določajo obravnavo teme. V tem kontekstu analizira izbor "zunanjih" ali "prisvojenih" glasov v studijskih intervjujih v Odmevih ter diskurzivno umeščanje intervjuvancev v narativ oddaje. Ugotavlja, da a) selekcija in b) diskurzivna obravnava gostov v studijskih intervjujih v Odmevih povzročata oz. omogočata zožanje razprave o "begunski problematiki" na polje legitimnih nasprotij, torej na tiste poglede, ki jih zastopa strankarska politika. S selekcijo in z obravnavo zunanjih glasov (gostov v studiu) se ustvarja t. i. mnenjski ali diskurzivni tunel, zaradi katerega prihaja do popolne simbolne marginalizacije vseh pogledov zunaj parlamentarnega mainstreama in njegovih interesov ter do obravnave "begunske problematike" kot sosledja pripetljajevTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaZRC SAZU