50 KB261 KB48 KB197820252011Koron, Alenkaštevilka:3letnik:34str. 263-280ISSN:0351-1189COBISSID:33421101URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-D2OZKV8RslSlovensko društvo za primerjalno književnostPrimerjalna književnostnaratologijanarratologypoeta vatespripovedna strukturapripovedovanjevsevedni pripovedovalecVsevedno pripovedovanje v pripovednoteoretskih omrežjih|Since modernism, omniscient narration has often been attacked, but it has rarely been studied and understood, despite its role in narrative discourse and metadiscourse. This article examines the polemics between two narrative theorists, Jonathan Culler and Meir Sternberg, who diverge on the nature of narrative omniscience and the usefulness of the concept for the study of narration. It also deals with the discussion of omniscient narration and the omniscient narrator by Matias Martínez and Janko Kos to shed light on the background and scope of their approaches and to point to the characteristics of omniscient narration that speak for its "long duration" in the world of narrativeVse od modernizma naprej je vsevedno pripovedovanje pogosto napadan, ampak redko preučevan in primerno razumljen pojem in to kljub pomembni vlogi, ki jo ima v pripovednem diskurzu in metadiskurzu. Prispevek se ukvarja s polemiko med dvema sodobnima teoretikoma pripovedi (Jonathanom Cullerjem in Meirjem Sternbergom) ter z obravnavo vsevednega pripovedovanja pri Matiasu Martínezu in Janku Kosu; osvetliti skuša ozadje in domet teh prispevkov ter ob primerih opozoriti na značilnosti vsevednega pripovedovanja, ki zagotavljajo njegovo "dolgo trajanje" v svetu pripovediTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlovensko društvo za primerjalno književnost