195 KB39 KB199420242004Pöttker, Horstletnik:11številka:2str. 83-94ISSN:1318-3222COBISSID:23327837URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-CZ7IMIUEenEvropski inštitut za komuniciranje in kulturoJavnost (Ljubljana)informiranjejournalismnovinarska etikanovinarstvoobjektivnostpoklicna etikaObjectivity as (self-)censorship| against the dogmatisation of professional ethics in journalism|The task of journalism in a democracy is to create publicness in the sense of unrestricted social communication. A broad and open interpretation of censorship means the creation of barriers to public communication not only by the state, but also by economic, social, and cultural conditions. This essay addresses professional principles of journalism - the separation of editorial and advertising sections, documentation and fiction, and facts and opinion - as means of self-censorship in a democracy. Where are the limits of these professional principles? What are the criteria that distinguish between their legitimate and illegitimate uses? This essay interprets the current tendency to dissolve the journalistic principle of separationNaloga novinarstva v demokraciji je ustvarjati javnost v pomenu neoviranega družbenega komuniciranja. Široka interpretacija cenzure vključuje ustvarjanje ovir javnemu komuniciranju ne samo s strani države, ampak tudi ovir, ki jih povzročajo ekonomske, socialne in kulturne razmere. Članek obravnava poklicna načela novinarstva - ločevanje uredniških in oglaševalskih vsebin, dokumentacije in fikcije, dejstev in mnenj - kot sredstva samocenzure v demokraciji. Kje so meje teh poklicnih načel? Kateri kriteriji omogočajo razlikovanje med legitimnimi in nelegitimnimi uporabami? Članek obravnava sodobne težnje po raztapljanju novinarskega načela ločevanjaTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaEvropski inštitut za komuniciranje in kulturo - EURICOM