359 KB49 KB194820252017Skačedubova, Marija Vadimovnaštevilka:1letnik:65str. 115-125ISSN:0350-6894COBISSID:63784034URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-CPO6GA3VruSlavistično društvo SlovenijeSlavistična revija14. st.deležnikIpatjevski letopispretekli časRussianruščinastara ruščinaK interpretacii slučaev upotreblenija -l- formy bez svjazki| (na materiale Ipate'evskoj letopisi)|The article analyzes instances of verbal l-forms used without auxiliary in Old Russian Hypatian Chronicle (13th-15th c.). Special emphasis is on the contexts where l-forms do not convey the meaning of the perfect tense. One part consists of contexts that are typical for participle predications. The other part consists of examples where the l-forms appear in typical participle contexts of the vstav (i) reče type. All examples where l-forms do not have the meaning of the perfect tense can be attributed either to the first or to the second group. Taking this into account, as well as the material from the dialects and other Slavic languages that include, to varying extent, adjectives going back to l-participles, it seems reasonable to assume that l-forms could function not only as a part of the compound verbal predicate, but also as a past participle -š-/-vš-TEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlavistično društvo Slovenije