<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-CPE30ALN/407df266-e13a-4811-9212-2484dae9db73/HTML"><dcterms:extent>43 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-CPE30ALN/7635f400-1719-4bb8-834a-ccb4aee6e7f6/PDF"><dcterms:extent>1520 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-CPE30ALN/b300f19c-660d-4770-8f2d-e17b2e5cb65e/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>41 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-CPE30ALN"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>1999</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Stanković, Peter</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:2</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:36</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 230-242</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:19129181</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-CPE30ALN</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Bourdieu, Pierre</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">družbena struktura</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">družbeni razredi</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">družbeno delovanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sociološke teorije</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">teorija družbe</dc:subject><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://vocab.getty.edu/ulan/500248421" /><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Praksa, habitus in polje| delo Pierra Bourdieuja kot poskus teoretske sinteze v sociološki teoriji|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Sociological theory of Pierre Bourdieu represents not only an amalgam of interesting and often even proving insights, but also one of the most important attempts for thoeretical synthesis in contemporary sociology. As many other sociologists, Bourdieu also tries to overcome simplifyed and one-sided classical theories, which focused exclusively on social structures, or on human agency. In order to overcome this futile cleveage on two opposed meta-theoretical traditions, Bourdieu introduces a dynamic triad praxis-habitus-field. He hopes that this solution will alow to understand bothsides of social dynamics in their intertwined essence. The article analyses the three notions and shows how Bourdieu has not achieved his goal: his solution adequatly conceptualizes only the structural side of social reality (the field), while the other side, human agency (or praxis), remains basically only a dependent variable</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Povzetek. Delo Pierra Bourdieuja predstavlja, poleg svoje siceršnje zanimivosti zaradi številnih zelo inovativnih in celo izzivalnih poudarkov, enega od najpomembnejših poskusov teoretske sinteze v sodobni sociološki teoriji. Kot mnogi drugi teoretiki tudi Bourdieu izhaja iz prepričanja o problematičnosti poenostavljajočih, na zgolj eno plat družbene dinamike (družbene strukture ali kreativno delovanje akterjev) osredotočenih klasičnih socioloških razlag. Da bi presegel to neplodno cepitev, vpelje Bourdieu dinamično triado praksa-habitus-polje, s pomočjo katere poskuša upoštevati obe plati družbene dinamike. Avtor članka z analizo vseh treh konceptov znotraj te triade pokaže, da Bourdieu s takšnim nastavkom ni dosegel zastavljenega cilja, saj njegove rešitve ustrezno konceptualizirajo zgolj strukturalni vidik (polje), pri čemer faktor keativnega delovanja posameznikov(praksa) obvisi v zraku kot neka povsem odvisna spremenljivka</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-CPE30ALN"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-CPE30ALN" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-CPE30ALN/7635f400-1719-4bb8-834a-ccb4aee6e7f6/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-CPE30ALN/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-CPE30ALN" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>