{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-CEOK82LE/68cc1fbb-0c4d-4030-a91f-bed33ad92a18/PDF","dcterms:extent":"1723 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-CEOK82LE/cee1c99e-4b12-4965-95f1-9a10d3d1f742/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"68 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1965-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1965"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-CEOK82LE","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Teorija in praksa"}],"dcterms:issued":"2014","dc:creator":"Katunarić, Vjeran","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:51"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:posebna"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 107-130, 418"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0040-3598","COBISSID:33260125","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-CEOK82LE"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Evolucionizem"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Evolutionism"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Globalizacija"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Globalization"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Social theory"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Sustainable development"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Teorija družbe"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Trajnostni razvoj"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1965-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Evolution, globalization and developmental hybrids|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Globalization represents a challenge to evolutionary theories of development. In this paper two theoretical paradigms of evolution are examined, transformational (Spencerian) and variational (Darwinian) paradigms, and their social theoretical counterparts respectively. Most social theories are entangled with different evolutionary paradigms. Also, most developmental policies are polarized between globalism, i. e. irrevocable integration into the global market, and autocentrism prone to replace import with exports and to political authoritarianism. Alternatives to such polarizing perspectives in terms of sustainable development, although principally more suitable to most countries, are not entirely or consequently implemented. Basically, sustainable development implicates a combination of the two evolutionary paradigms. More specifically, author expounds the concept of a culturally oriented sustainable development. Further on, he argues that intersections of transformation and variation processes, that produce mixed modalities of the modern development, i. e. societal \"hybrids\", are more suitable for decent survival than globalization based exclusively on the free market principles. Finally, he presumes that an array of the \"hybrids\" of socioeconomic and sociocultural development would be easier to manage over by a responsible world government than by the means of current laissez-faire policy, close to Darwinian or selectionist paradigm of evolution protruded mostly by developed countries"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Globalizacija predstavlja izziv evolucionističnim teorijam razvoja. V tem članku raziskujemo dve teoretični evolucionistični paradigmi: transformacijsko (spencerjevsko) in variacijsko (darwinovsko) ter njuni družbenoteoretski različici. V večini teorij o družbi se prepletajo različne evolucionistične paradigme. Prav tako je večina razvojnih politik razdvojenih med globalizmom, tj. nepovratno integracijo v globalni trg, in avtocentrizmom, nagnjenim k nadomeščanju uvoza z izvozom ter k politični avtoritarnosti. Alternative takšnim nasprotujočim si usmeritvam v smislu trajnostnega razvoja, ki bi bil sicer bolj primeren za večino držav, niso v celoti ali smiselno izvajane. V osnovi trajnostni razvoj predpostavlja kombinacijo dveh evolucionističnih paradigem. Avtor pojasnjuje koncept kulturno orientiranega trajnostnega razvoja. Še več, trdi, da je presečišče transformacijskih in variacijskih procesov, ki proizvaja mešane modalitete sodobnega razvoja, t. i. societalne \"hibride\", bolj primerno za spodobno preživetje kot pa globalizacija, ki je osnovana izključno na načelih svobodnega trga. Na koncu avtor ugotavlja, da bi bilo matriko \"hibridov\" socio-ekonomskega in sociokulturnega razvoja lažje upravljati z odgovorno svetovno vlado kakor pa s sredstvi sedanje laissez-faire politike, bližje darwinovski ali selekcionistični paradigmi evolucije, ki jo potiskajo naprej razvite države"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-CEOK82LE","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-CEOK82LE"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-CEOK82LE/68cc1fbb-0c4d-4030-a91f-bed33ad92a18/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-CEOK82LE/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-CEOK82LE"}}}}