1326 KB0 KB199020252019Zachariah, Benjaminštevilka:50str. 71-88ISSN:0353-6777COBISSID:44909613URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-C89M8U6VenInštitut za slovensko izseljenstvoDve domovinicollective memorykolektivni spominlegitimationlegitimitetaoral historypisanjepostvarjenjepripovedreificationreifikacijaustna pričevanjawritingzgodovinski viriThe tongue is mightier than the printing press?| reflections on the production of oral histories and on languages of legitimation|The article is a set of reflections on the uses of oral history in a communicative endeav-our that succeeds very often in effacing the role of the interviewer even as the de-mands of self-reflexivity insist on centring that role. The author consider cases where there is neither a clearly defined interviewer nor interviewee, nor is there an attempt to write down experiences as history. Following this, it asks what can be told in or by oral histories when the communication that produces them seeks to recover other-wise inaccessible histories and memories, but must use languages of legitimation that often cannot speak clearly about those inaccessible histories and memoriesČlanek prinaša nekaj razmislekov o uporabi ustne zgodovine v komunikaciji, v kateri je vloga spraševalca pogosto podcenjena, čeprav bi potreba po samorefleksiji terjala ravno nasprotno. Avtor navaja primere brez jasno opredeljenega spraševalca in intervjuvanca, kakor tudi brez zapisa dogajanja kot zgodbe. Posledično se sprašuje, kaj vse ustna zgodovina lahko sporoča, če si komunikacija, v kateri nastajajo ustni zgodovinski viri, prizadeva oživljati sicer nedostopne pripovedi in spomine, hkrati pa mora uporabljati neki jezik legitimitete, ki pa teh pogosto ni sposoben jasno izrazitiTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaZRC SAZU