{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-C7Z5B45K/-a5f4-bb22-b2f6ef3ca-1e85879bf3d876d/PDF","dcterms:extent":"124 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-C7Z5B45K/ff25a672-bfb6-4935-8e3a-bfbd1288ed7c/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"31 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-C7Z5B45K","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-2XUGOISV"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Podjetje in delo"}],"dcterms:issued":"2020","dc:creator":"Bergant, Katarina","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:46"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:6/7"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 1010-1019"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0353-6521","COBISSID_HOST:44116995","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-C7Z5B45K"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Lexpera"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"credit of imprisonment served under the earlier sentence"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"credit of time spent in detention"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"denarna kazen"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"fine"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"globa"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"kazensko pravo"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"misdemeanour fine"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"odmera kazni"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"sentencing"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"vštevanje odvzema prostosti"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"vštevanje pripora"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Odmera kazni| ustavnoskladno vštevanje pripora in prejšnje kazni|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Court sentencing marks the end of evidentiary procedures. With perpetrators committing diverse criminal offences either once or repeatedly, simultaneously or successively, with varying degrees of intensity and deferring time and locational circumstances, deprivations of freedom and sanctions can be imposed in various stages of the procedure. Criminal code thus binds the court to consider and include in its sentencing any previous invasions of freedom or other imposed sanctions with no regard to the type of procedure during which they were imposed. The descriptions of criminal offences, misdemeanour offences and violations of military discipline, all criminal matters and thus part of the system of deviant behaviour enforced with sanctions should, on the legislative level, complement rather than overlap. Credit of time spent in detention and imprisonment, as prescribed in Article 56 of the Criminal code of Slovenia, are inconsistently regulated. The main problem lies with its third paragraph, where the general wording does not offer qualitative differentiation of the perpetrator's actions, but rather implies their overlap as the condition for the use of the credit. According to ne bis in idem rule, this situation should not be allowed. This article presents the problem of limited possibilities for constitutionally consistent interpretation and use of the third paragraph of Article 56"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Sodna odmera kazni storilcu kaznivega dejanja pomeni končni epilog dokaznega postopka po končani glavni obravnavi. Ker storilci kazniva dejanja in druga prepovedana ravnanja lahko izvršujejo različno, enkrat ali večkrat, hkrati ali sukcesivno, z različno intenziteto in v različnih časovnih in krajevnih okoliščinah, jim je lahko v različnih fazah postopkov omejena ali odvzeta prostost ali izrečena različna sankcija. Zato Kazenski zakonik (KZ-1) napotuje sodišče, da pri odmeri kazni upošteva in všteje vsakršen odvzem prostosti in izrečene sankcije ne glede na postopek, v katerem je bil storilcu odrejen odvzem prostosti ali izrečena sankcija. Opisi posameznih kaznivih dejanj, prekrškov in kršitev vojaške discipline, ki so vsi del sistema odklonskih ravnanj, na katera slovenski zakonodajalec veže sankcije, in so zato po naravi kazenske zadeve, bi se že na normativni ravni morali med seboj dopolnjevati in ne prekrivati. Vštevanje pripora in prejšnje kazni nedosledno normativno ureja zakonsko besedilo 56. člena KZ-1. Zlasti besedilo tretjega odstavka 56. člena KZ-1 je na normativni ravni zasnovano tako, da ne ponuja kvalitativnega razločevanja in razmejevanja posameznih storilčevih ravnanj, temveč kot pogoj za vštevanje kazni določa celo njihovo prekrivanje, do katerega ob doslednem upoštevanju pravila ne bis in idem sploh ne bi smelo priti. Zastavlja se vprašanje kako, če sploh, si razlagati in ustavnoskladno uporabiti določbo tretjega odstavka 56. člena KZ-1"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-C7Z5B45K","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-C7Z5B45K"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-C7Z5B45K/-a5f4-bb22-b2f6ef3ca-1e85879bf3d876d/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-C7Z5B45K/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-C7Z5B45K"}}}}