<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-BZUHDJQP/bf340dae-655f-4091-9dd0-3d763e31572a/HTML"><dcterms:extent>53 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-BZUHDJQP/0cd99ff6-c5b6-4ff7-b8e8-f4833786f5ce/PDF"><dcterms:extent>2014 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-BZUHDJQP/813c75d9-64cd-42d2-92c3-133d8b72148a/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>52 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-BZUHDJQP"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2000</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Švab, Alenka</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:2</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:37</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 248-263</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:19707741</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-BZUHDJQP</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">avtoritarnost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">družina</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">family</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">očetje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">očetovstvo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">postmoderna</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sociologija družine</dc:subject><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q8436" /><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Poti in stranpoti novih očetovskih identitet| nekaj misli o sociološki interpretaciji novega (postmodernega) očetovstva|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">'New' fatherhood is one of the most hotly contested topics in the family changes debates. It is also the topic which most explicitly divides theorists into those who claim new phenomenon of involved father and those who ground their arguments in empirical research, claiming that no significant changes in the field of fatherhood and their involvement in the family have occurred. How to explain this conundrum? Taking into account the latest historical findings on modern family, the authoress attempts to answer the question by challenging the concept of 'paternal presence/absence in the family', whose cultural meanings vary through time to a great extent. The analysis of topology of 'new' fatherhood implies the phenomenon to be anything but a clearly defined social phenomenon. Just the opposite, in its social diversity,identity trouble and ideological duality, the 'new' fatherhood appears to be far from social model of active parenting</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Novo očetovstvo je fenomen, ki v razpravah o družinskih spremembah v postmodernosti najbolj buri družboslovne duhove. To je tema, ki teoretike družine najbolj razločuje: na eni strani stojijo perspektive, ki ugotavljajo nov fenomen vpletenega očeta, na drugi strani so perspektive, ki v empiriji utemeljujejo teze o tem, da se očetovska prisotnost v družini ni bistveno spremenila. Kako torej pojasniti to dilemo? Avtorica poskuša, upoštevajoč novejše izsledke socialne zgodovine, najti odgovor v problematizaciji koncepta'očetovske odsotnosti/prisotnosti v družini', katerega kulturni pomeni časovno intenzivno variirajo. Analiza topologij 'novega' očetovstva pa nakazuje, da je 'novo' očetovstvo vse prej kot jasno definiran družbeni fenomen. Ravno nasprotno, v svoji pojavni raznolikosti, identitetni zmedi in ideološki dvojnosti, je 'novo' očetovstvo vse prej kot družbeni model aktivnega starševstva</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-BZUHDJQP"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-BZUHDJQP" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-BZUHDJQP/0cd99ff6-c5b6-4ff7-b8e8-f4833786f5ce/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-BZUHDJQP/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-BZUHDJQP" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>