765 KB62 KB201220252021Gašparič, Jureštevilka:2letnik:61str. 169-192ISSN:0353-0329DOI:10.51663/pnz.61.2.08COBISSID_HOST:84783363URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-BXGTCYGWslInštitut za novejšo zgodovinoPrispevki za novejšo zgodovinočaskorpusna lingvistikaparlamentarizemparlamentarna demokracijapolitična zgodovinapolitični obračuniposlovnikiParlament in čas| o dojemanju časa v sodobnem parlamentu|As an important and often decisive factor, time in particular has an impact on political life. In the work of parliaments, its importance comes to the fore in a very concrete form. In the discussion at hand, we will attempt to understand the modern perception of time on the one hand and the political dimensions and their impact on the other hand. The central thesis that we will adhere to is the following: in the modern era, time has become a crucial commodity. It needed to be managed rationally, which therefore called for efficient operations. The perception of time coincided with the need to regulate it, to adjust to the muchneeded speed. Stemming from this postulate, the perception of politics and the political was changing. In the methodological sense, the present discussion is based on an analysis of the past manipulations with time (in the 19th and 20th centuries) % on a quantitative analysis of the scope of work of the last parliamentary decades and, in particular, on an analysis of the perception of time among deputies as expressed in their speeches (the latter has been achieved using the possibilities nowadays offered to the researchers by corpus linguistics and the siParl 2.0 text corpus)Čas kot sila pomemben in pogosto odločujoč dejavnik je še posebej prisoten v političnem življenju, v zelo konkretni obliki pa njegov pomen izstopa v parlamentu. V pričujoči razpravi bomo skušali razumeti dojemanje časa v moderni dobi na eni strani in politične razsežnosti ter njihove vplive na drugi strani. Osrednja teza, ki ji bomo sledili, je sledeča: V dobi moderne je čas postajal pomembna dobrina, z njim je bilo treba ravnati racionalno in zato je bilo treba delovati učinkovito. Njegovo dojemanje je sovpadalo s potrebo po njegovem uravnavanju, prilagajanju prepotrebni hitrosti. Izhajajoč iz tega postulata, se je spreminjalo dojemanje politike in političnega. Razprava metodološko temelji na analizi preteklih manipulacij s časom (v 19. in 20. stoletju), na kvantitativni analizi obsega dela zadnjih parlamentarnih desetletij in zlasti na analizi dojemanja časa med poslanci, ki so ga izražali v svojih govorih (zadnje s pomočjo možnosti, ki jih danes raziskovalcu nudita korpusna lingvistika in besedilni korpus siParl 2.0)TEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaInštitut za novejšo zgodovino