<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-B8FJ68VU/dbbbb760-f375-4abc-9be3-7d08d40a0f63/PDF"><dcterms:extent>193 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-B8FJ68VU/95187dd0-ed04-44b5-abae-9edb15f04966/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>72 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2011-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2011</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-B8FJ68VU"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:SPR-OSUSX1U0" /><dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Lovšin, Špela</dc:creator><dc:creator>Štemberger, Katja</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:letn. 81</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 85-108, 243, 253</dc:format><dc:identifier>DOI:10.51940/2021.1.85-108</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1854-3839</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:90755331</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-B8FJ68VU</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Pravna fakulteta</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Zbornik znanstvenih razprav (Pravna fakulteta. 1991)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">glavna obravnava (pravo)</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pravdni postopek</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sodišča</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sodni postopek</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sodniki</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Upravni spor</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2011-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Posledice neudeležbe strank na glavni obravnavi v upravnem sporu|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The paper discusses legal consequences of non-attendance of the parties at the main hearing in administrative dispute. Their regulation in the Slovene Administrative Dispute Act (ADA) is very limited, which often creates dilemma for administrative judges about how to carry on the proceedings in the event of the parties’ non-attendance. The growing importance of the right to main hearing in administrative dispute further contributes to this dilemma. In the first part, the paper examines the substance of the right to a main hearing in administrative dispute, consequences of non-attendance of the parties in the legal regimes of selected European countries and in the Slovene regulation of civil procedure. The second, central part of the paper analyses the consequences of non-attendance of the parties as provided in the current ADA and in the proposal of its amendment, which fails to address the issue comprehensively. The paper is concluded by the authors’ proposals of de lege ferenda regulation</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Avtorici obravnavata pravne posledice neudeležbe strank na glavni obravnavi v upravnem sporu. Te so namreč v ZUS-1 urejene precej skopo, zaradi česar se upravni sodniki v praksi pogosto znajdejo pred dilemo, kako v primeru nenavzočnosti strank ravnati. K temu pripomore tudi čedalje bolj poudarjen pomen pravice do glavne obravnave v upravnem sporu. V prvem delu prispevka najprej obravnavata vsebino pravice do glavne obravnave v upravnem sporu, posledice neudeležbe strank na glavni obravnavi v upravnem sporu v ureditvah izbranih evropskih držav ter v slovenski ureditvi pravdnega postopka. V drugem, osrednjem delu prispevka, pa se osredinjata na posledice neudeležbe strank na glavni obravnavi v upravnem sporu v skladu s trenutno ureditvijo ter predlogom novele ZUS-1C, ki po njunem mnenju omenjene problematike ne obravnava celovito. Prispevek skleneta s predlogi o ureditvi de lege ferenda</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-B8FJ68VU"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-B8FJ68VU" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-B8FJ68VU/dbbbb760-f375-4abc-9be3-7d08d40a0f63/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-B8FJ68VU/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-B8FJ68VU" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>