{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-B5EHOHCH/3a705ef4-3733-408a-9463-89d02711f59a/PDF","dcterms:extent":"295 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-B5EHOHCH/a95181b0-6ffb-485c-8c4c-2ca9ba1fab40/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"126 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2024","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2024"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-B5EHOHCH","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-CFT6PFGK"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pravnik"}],"dcterms:issued":"2015","dc:creator":"Duclos-Grécourt, Marie-Laure","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:1/2"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:70"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 53-90, 143-144"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0032-6976","COBISSID:14231889","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-B5EHOHCH"],"dc:language":["fr","sl"],"dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza društev pravnikov Slovenije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"absolutizem"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Anglija"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"England"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"odločanje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"parlamenti"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pravna zgodovina"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2024"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Droit de prescription et libertés parlementaires sous la Restauration anglaise (1660-1688)| Pravica izdajati predpise in parlamentarne svoboščine v času angleške restavracije (1660-1688)|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The article assesses the argumentation in debates on the right of the House of Commons to make law based on the historical development of the House. The common lawyers were in favour of this right arguing that this was their right prior to introduction of the feudal system. The royalists claimed that the rights of the nobles were strictly depending on the nature of their tenancy of the land and their service with council. The rights of the Commons, knights representing the counties, were based on custom. So the partisans of the rights of the House of Commons opposing the absolute power of the king argued that a custom developed as the commons were approving the taxes and that the king was making law in coordination with both houses. The royalists stressed that the Commons were entitled only to suggest, while the lords served with advice. In any case, the only legal maker of law was the king and all the liberties of the Parliament were merely a concession depending of his good will"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Članek obravnava utemeljevanje zakonodajne vloge spodnjega doma angleškega parlamenta z njegovim zgodovinskim razvojem. Zagovorniki sistema common law so se sklicevali na vlogo ljudskih zborov še v času pred uvedbo fevdalnega reda, vladarjevi privrženci pa so ugovarjali z utemeljitvijo, da gre za pravice, ki so najtesneje povezane s podelitvijo zemlje plemičem in njihovo službo z nasvetom. Lordi so bili člani sveta, ker so dobili gospostva neposredno od vladarja. Vitezi, člani zbora komun, pa so to pravico dobili na podlagi običaja. Glede zakonodajne pravice spodnjega doma so zagovorniki spodnjega doma zaradi nasprotovanja kraljevi absolutni oblasti spet poudarjali vlogo običaja. Tako je spodnji dom odločal o davkih in zato vladar vlada usklajeno z obema domoma parlamenta. Nasprotno so kraljevi zavezniki poudarjali, da spodnji dom lahko zgolj prosi in predlaga, medtem ko lordi kralju lahko tudi svetujejo. V vsakem primeru pa je edini upravičeni ustvarjalec prava vladar in vse pravice in svoboščine parlamenta so stvar njegove dobre volje oziroma njegovo darilo"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-B5EHOHCH","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-B5EHOHCH"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-B5EHOHCH/3a705ef4-3733-408a-9463-89d02711f59a/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-B5EHOHCH/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-B5EHOHCH"}}}}