1602 KB20 KB197220252001Ivančič Kutin, Barbaraštevilka:1letnik:30str. 183-191ISSN:0352-0447COBISSID:18849837URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-ANPNOID0slSlovenska akademija znanosti in umetnostiTraditiones (Ljubljana)ethnologyetnologijapripovedništvoSloveniaSlovenijaslovstvena folkloraDober pripovedovalec z zornega kota poslušalca in raziskovalca|The paper focuses on the notion of good narrator, his or her characteristics, and pecularities, and the perception of such a person by the public on the receiving end, and by a researcher (folklorst). It tries to answer the question whether a narrator who is good according to the public is similarly, viewed by the researcher who is trying to documents a certain folkloristic event. Listed are the opinions of informant6s from the vicinity of Bovec, who in certain cases have themselves acted as narrator's (their statements have been obtained in the course of collecting material for author's M. A. paper). The paper also focuses on author's own experience, as well as on conclussions by Milko Matičetov, a well-known folklorist who conducted his own research of the area several years agoV prispevku želim opredeliti pojem dobrega pripovedovalca, njegove lastnosti in posebnosti ter pogled nanj z zornega kota sprejemalca (občinstva) in raziskovalca (slovstvenega folklorista). Odgovoriti poskušam na vprašanje, ali je pripovedovalec, ki je po kriterijih publike označen za dobrega, enako dober tudi za raziskovalca, ki želi folklorni dogodek dokumentirati. Podajam mnenja informatorjev z Bovškega, ki so v nekaterih primerih obenem tudi pripovedovalci ( njihove izjave sem pridobila z interjuji med zbiranjem gradiva za svojo magistrsko nalogo), svoje izkušnje in opažanja ter ugotovitve znanega folklorista Milka Matičetova, ki je pred leti raziskoval na BovšekmTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of Slovenia