{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-A6D5Y85T/f39be093-7e99-4939-b77b-85c128e7c4c2/PDF","dcterms:extent":"945 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-A6D5Y85T/8da476c6-b928-4bd3-8450-87c4687cbe02/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"0 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2010-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2010"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-A6D5Y85T","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-PFDPDLU7"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Dignitas (Ljubljana)"}],"dcterms:issued":"2010","dc:creator":"Sovdat, Jadranka","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:45/46"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 115-139"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:1408-9653","COBISSID:513591416","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-A6D5Y85T"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Fakulteta za slovenske in mednarodne študije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pristojnosti"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"ustavna sodišča"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"ustavne spremembe"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Ustavno sodišče"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2010-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Predlagane spremembe ustave - Diskrecija pri izbiranju pobud in ustavnih pritožb za obravnavanje in privilegirani predlagatelji|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Insisting on the quantitative approach to the protection of constitutionality,as well as of human rights and fundamental freedoms before the Constitutional Court, which decides several thousand cases a year, contributes little to the quality of this protection and even less to raising its level. Judicial management measures adopted over the last ten years demonstrate the necessity of this approach to ensure work efficiency, however,its scope is limited. For almost twenty years now, the judiciary has also been vested with the task of protecting constitutionality bestowed upon it by the Constitution. If regular courts do not perform this task, nine constitutional judges cannot do it instead of them. The amendments to the Constitution are necessary and so is discretion in selecting which constitutional complaints and petitions the Constitutional Court will decide. The Constitutional Court is committed to adopt clear, unambiguous positions on the contents of human rights and thus create constitutional guidelines to be followed by the regular courts and other state authorities which determine the rights, obligations and legal interests of individuals and legal entities.The introduction of discretion in case selection is closely connected with the scope of privileged applicants auhorised to institute the proceedings for the review of constitutionality of legal acts; if this scope is too broad - as it is now - the introduction of discretion will not achieve the desired effect"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Vztrajanje na količinskem pristopu pri varstvu ustavnosti ter človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin pred ustavnim sodiščem, ki odloča o več tisoč zadevah letno, ne prispeva h kakovosti tega varstva in še manj k zviševanju njegove ravni. Desetletni ukrepi sodnega menedžmenta pokažejo, da je ta sicer nujen za učinkovito delo, vendar ima svoj omejen domet. Ustava že skoraj dvajset let nalaga sodstvu skrb tudi za varovanje ustavnosti. Če redna sodišča te vloge ne opravijo, je namesto njih ne more odigrati devet ustavnih sodnikov. Ustavne spremembe so potrebne, potrebna je uvedba diskrecije pri izbiri, o katerih ustavnih pritožbah in pobudah naj odloča ustavno sodišče. To mora z jasnimi stališči o vsebini človekovih pravic ustvarjati ustavnopravna vodila sodiščem in drugim državnim organom, ki odločajo o pravicah, obveznostih in pravnih interesih posameznikov in pravnih oseb. Z uvedbo diskrecije pri izbiri zadev je tesno povezano število privilegiranih predlagateljev, ki lahko pred ustavnim sodiščem začnejo postopek za oceno ustavnosti predpisa; če bo to število (kot je sedaj) pretirano veliko, uvedba diskrecije ne bo dosegla želenih učinkov"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-A6D5Y85T","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-A6D5Y85T"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-A6D5Y85T/f39be093-7e99-4939-b77b-85c128e7c4c2/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Fakulteta za slovenske in mednarodne študije v Kranju"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-A6D5Y85T/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-A6D5Y85T"}}}}