<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-8YIN5IOH/e6c6ff82-516c-4f53-b343-71e619100a49/PDF"><dcterms:extent>522 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-8YIN5IOH/c4935035-c92f-4d0e-8161-b0e97fd759ed/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>0 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2011-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2011</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-8YIN5IOH"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:SPR-OSUSX1U0" /><dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Kos, Marjan</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:letn. 79</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 41-69, 76-77</dc:format><dc:identifier>COBISSID:17172305</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1854-3839</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-8YIN5IOH</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Pravna fakulteta</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Zbornik znanstvenih razprav (Pravna fakulteta. 1991)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Article 4(2) TEU</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">constitutional identity</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Court of Justice of the European Union</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">človekove pravice</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">drugi odstavek 4. člena PEU</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">European Union</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Evropska unija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">human rights</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Hungary</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Madžarska</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">narodna identiteta</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">National identity</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">proportionality</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Sodišče Evropske unije</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sorazmernost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">ustavna identiteta</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2011-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">The relevance of national identity in European Union law and its potential for instrumentalisation|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The aim of the paper is to present the concept of national identity and its role in constitutional disputes. Despite its ambiguity, based on national constitutional courts` and the CJEU`s case law, at least a general framework concerning its substance and function in EU law can be established. It demonstrates that although the concept of national identity from Article 4(2) TEU may be prone to abuse, sufficient safeguards exist to prevent the instrumentalisation of the concept. Current attempts, particularly in the case of Hungary, to (ab)use the concept in order to evade EU law obligations are, therefore, highly unlikely to succeed before the CJEU</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Namen prispevka je predstaviti koncept ustavne identitete in njegovo vlogo v ustavnih sporih. Kljub nejasnostim, povezanim s tem pojmom, je mogoče na podlagi sodne prakse nacionalnih ustavnih sodišč in Sodišča EU vzpostaviti vsaj splošni okvir vsebine in funkcije nacionalne identitete v okviru prava EU. Pokaže se, da kljub navidezni dovzetnosti koncepta nacionalne identitete iz drugega odstavka 4. člena PEU za zlorabe v praksi Sodišča EU obstajajo ustrezne varovalke, ki lahko preprečijo njegovo instrumentalizacijo. Trenutni poskusi, kot so na primer na Madžarskem, da bi koncept zlorabili z namenom izogibanja obveznostim po pravu EU imajo zato zelo malo možnosti za uspeh pred Sodiščem EU</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-8YIN5IOH"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-8YIN5IOH" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-8YIN5IOH/e6c6ff82-516c-4f53-b343-71e619100a49/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-8YIN5IOH/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-8YIN5IOH" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>