2126 KB46 KB197820252018Pobežin, Gregorštevilka:2letnik:41str. 99-115ISSN:0351-1189COBISSID:43245357URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-8UWVCES0slSlovensko društvo za primerjalno književnostPrimerjalna književnostnacionalizemprotestantizemprotestantska književnostpublicistikaTridentinski koncilVergerij, Peter PavelNihil odiosius quam nomen Italorum| Vergerij mlajši med humanističnim univerzalizmom in nacionalizmom|Pier Paolo Vergerio (the Younger) wrote his "Two Treatises of the Papal Secretary" (Actiones duae secretarii pontificii) as a fictional debate, intended for Pope Paul IV. The satirical texts, to which Vergerio subsequently added the third one, are by no means essential reading - nor are they the best of what Vergerio himself wrote in his life. However, they manage to create the impression that they bring a serious matter-of-fact debate about real dilemmas related to the Council of Trent. During the time of their writing, these dilemmas were more or less non-existent (albeit not due to Vergerio's fault but rather because of Paul's reluctance towards the Council of Trent). While the first debate gives testimony of Vergerio's "political and expert background", the second one openly addresses not only the issues of religious strife but also the possibility of an armed conflict, which could possibly take place after reconvening the council. The line of thought expressed in this second debate is marked by openly nationalistic viewpoints, to which Vergerio - a former papal nuncio to Ferdinand's court - could be no stranger, yet he could not have developed any intimate inclination towards them as a humanist of the universalist type (and it seems unfathomable that he did so later during the years of exile). This paper addresses Vergerio's Actiones, trying to raise some questions about what motivated their author during the time of their writingPeter Pavel Vergerij mlajši je svoja "Dopisa papeškega tajnika" (Duae actiones secretarii pontificii) oblikoval kot namišljeno živo razpravo, namenjeno papežu Pavlu IV. Satirični razpravi, ki jima je Vergerij nekaj let kasneje dodal še tretji spis, v nobenem pogledu ne predstavljata vrhunca Vergerijevega literarnega ustvarjanja, vendar jima brez težav uspe ustvariti vtis, da gre za povsem resno debato na temo stvarnih dilem, povezanih s Tridentinskim koncilom, ki pa so bile v času njunega nastanka bolj ali manj fiktivne narave - ne po avtorjevi krivdi, pač pa zaradi zunanjih okoliščin, predvsem Pavlovega odpora do Tridentinskega koncila. Medtem ko prva razprava izkazuje Vergerijevo "politično in strokovno poreklo", pa druga razprava brez zadržkov odpira ne le vprašanja verskih trenj, temveč tudi vprašanje morebitne vojne, ki bi sledila ponovnemu sklicu koncila, pri čemer ima njegovo razmišljanje tudi izrazito nacional(istič)ne razsežnosti. Te Vergeriju kot nekdanjemu papeškemu nunciju pred njegovim odhodom iz Italije sicer niso mogle biti tuje, a jih kot humanistični univerzalist še ni mogel ponotranjiti (in jih bržkone ni ponotranjil niti kasneje). Pričujoči prispevek tematizira obe Vergerijevi razpravi in skuša odpreti nekaj vprašanj o tem, kaj je avtorja motiviralo pri njunem nastankuTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlovensko društvo za primerjalno književnost