<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-8JMBG28M</identifier><date>2020</date><relation>documents/doc/8/URN_NBN_SI_doc-8JMBG28M_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/8/URN_NBN_SI_doc-8JMBG28M_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">2/3</format><format format_type="volume">49</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 157-162</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">0583-6050</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">68002307</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-8JMBG28M</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Slovenska akademija znanosti in umetnosti</publisher><source>Acta carsologica</source><rights>BY-NC-ND</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">biografije</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">Culver, David C.</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">kras (geologija)</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">krasoslovje</subject><title>"For most of its history, biospeleology has been a poor cousin of the other speleological disciplines"</title><title>interview with David Culver</title></Record>