<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-8G2B9QI0/1285f7d8-2064-49e2-82db-81d40f41019c/PDF"><dcterms:extent>524 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-8G2B9QI0/e74b5ba1-ff6a-459d-a29d-6552f213387f/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>55 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2013-2017"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2013</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2017</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-8G2B9QI0"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/urn:NBN:SI:spr-AX7YLI7J" /><dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Hejč, David</dc:creator><dc:creator>Potěšil, Lukáš</dc:creator><dc:creator>Skulová, Soňa</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:12</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:2/3</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 123-142</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:2335-3414</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:4370350</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-8G2B9QI0</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za upravo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Mednarodna revija za javno upravo</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">administrative procedure</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">appeal</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">central administrative authority</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">centralni upravni organ</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Czech Republic</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Češka</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pritožba</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">remonstrance</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">ugovor</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">upravni postopek</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2013-2017" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Remonstrance against decisions made by central administrative bodies in the Czech Republic|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The remonstrance is traditional standard (ordinary) remedial measure which can be (only) applied after the first instance decision has been issued by central administrative body. The article is heading to verify the hypothesis whether the remonstrance does reflect the principle of two instances in entirety. As the finding of the research it can be pointed out that the remonstrance represents relative exclusion of the principle of two instances, which is applied only in a modified form, as the remonstrance is not decided by any higher, independent administrative authority, but by the identical central administrative body, namely by its head, not by its remonstrance committee, which issues "only" recommendations/advices. We concluded that possible solutions are either transformation remonstrance committees into administrative bodies/tribunals, or rules providing the central administrative bodies do not make first instance decisions</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Ugovor je tradicionalno redno pravno sredstvo, ki se lahko (izključno) uporablja po izdani odločitvi centralnega upravnega organa. Namen članka je preveriti hipotezo, ali ugovor v celoti odraža načelo dvostopenjskega odločanja. Glede na ugotovitve raziskave lahko ugotovimo, da pomeni ugovor relativno izključitev tega načela, ki se uporablja samo v omejeni obliki, saj o ugovoru ne odloča neki višji, neodvisni upravni organ, temveč isti upravni organ, ki je izpodbijani akt izdal, čeprav je njegov predstojnik; ne pa pritožbena komisija, ki izdaja ''samo'' priporočila/nasvete. Ugotovili smo, da sta mogoči rešitvi preoblikovanje pritožbenih komisij v upravne organe/tribunale ali sprejetje pravil, po katerih centralni upravni organi ne bi bili pristojni za odločanje na prvi stopnji</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-8G2B9QI0"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-8G2B9QI0" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-8G2B9QI0/1285f7d8-2064-49e2-82db-81d40f41019c/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za upravo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-8G2B9QI0/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-8G2B9QI0" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>