<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-89GJ35FU/299c6948-08c0-4445-bbfd-2737c3fcb723/PDF"><dcterms:extent>326 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-89GJ35FU/2edd1b15-f121-4377-8cfe-d4e46eece4be/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>33 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1921-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1921</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-89GJ35FU"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ZCWKSFUC" /><dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Wyrostkiewicz, Michał</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:85</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 73-82</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0006-5722</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI:10.34291/BV2025/01/Wyrostkiewicz</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:245181187</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-89GJ35FU</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Založba Univerze v Ljubljani</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Bogoslovni vestnik</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">anthropocene</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">antropocen</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">ecological debate</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">ecological morality</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">ecological sin</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">ekološka morala</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">ekološka razprava</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">ekološki greh</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">environmental ethics</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">greh</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">okoljska etika</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">sin</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1921-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Understanding the concept of ecological sin| towards optimizing the discourse on the anthropocene| Razumevanje koncepta ekološkega greha| na poti k optimizaciji diskurza o antropocenu|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Concern for the natural environment has been an important topic in today’s world. In this context, the concept of ecological sin appears. Although it is making an increasing career in public discourse, is still ambiguous. This situation significantly distorts public and academic discussions about ecology, environmental ethics and the Anthropocene. An in-depth explanation of the issues of ecological sin and its theological and social context is the goal of this study. Since the idea of ecological sin originates from Christian theology, its full understanding requires looking at this issue from this perspective. Here, sin is presented as the misappropriation of the order discovered by reason and confirmed by experience. This article is intended to be the voice of a Christian (Catholic) moral theologian in the discourse on the Anthropocene and environmental ethics</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Skrb za naravno okolje je ena ključnih tem sodobnega sveta. V tem okviru se pojavlja tudi pojem ekološkega greha, ki si v javnem diskurzu vse bolj utira pot, a ostaja dvoumen. Takšna nejasnost bistveno vpliva na javne in akademske razprave o ekologiji, okoljski etiki in antropocenu. Namen naše študije je poglobljena razlaga problematike ekološkega greha ter njegovega teološkega in družbenega ozadja. Ker ideja ekološkega greha izhaja iz krščanske teologije, njegovo celovito razumevanje zahteva obravnavo znotraj tega okvira. Greh je v njem predstavljen kot zloraba reda, ki ga razkriva razum in potrjuje izkušnja. Članek želi k razpravi o antropocenu in okoljski etiki prispevati glas krščanskega (katoliškega) moralnega teologa</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-89GJ35FU"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-89GJ35FU" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-89GJ35FU/299c6948-08c0-4445-bbfd-2737c3fcb723/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Teološka fakulteta</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-89GJ35FU/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-89GJ35FU" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>