{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-7ECQC06Q/7cf0cbdb-add0-4922-9a8f-8469eb6e4093/PDF","dcterms:extent":"405 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-7ECQC06Q/b11f8d68-3fd0-4bcf-920a-9a001d718385/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"60 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1965-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1965"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-7ECQC06Q","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Teorija in praksa"}],"dcterms:issued":"2017","dc:creator":"Malešič, Marjan","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:54"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:6"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 947-968, 1109-1110"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0040-3598","COBISSID:35392861","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-7ECQC06Q"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Visoka šola za politične vede"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"International migration"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"International security"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Javno mnenje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Mass media"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Mednarodna varnost"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Mednarodne migracije"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"migracije"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Množični mediji"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Public opinion"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1965-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The securitisation of migrations in Europe| the case of Slovenia|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"This article explores the securitisation of migrations in Slovenia as a transit country for migrants during 2015-2016. We examine the representation of migrations in the printed media, social media and in political discourse. The article contributes to the theoretical debate by proposing a dynamic migration-related security continuum which takes into account the legitimate security concerns of the migrants, the transit countries, and those of the host societies. The empirical analysis explores the attempts to frame migrants in the context of securitisation. Our findings reveal that the printed media was relatively neutral in this process or even opposed the over-securitisation of migrations, whereas political actors were biased. The Slovenian government adopted a balanced approach in terms of recognising the legal rights of migrants, especially of refugees, as well as the legitimate security concerns of its own citizens. In practice however, restrictive measures were applied which contributed to the securitisation of migrations. The main opposition political party spearheaded the securitisation of migrations with a discourse based on selective information, simplification and exaggeration. Our analysis of the survey data reveals that this influenced public opinion"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Članek obravnava sekuritizacijo (ang. securitization) migracij prek procesa njihovega uokvirjanja (ang. framing) v tisku, družbenih medijih in v javnosti. Primer je Slovenija, ki je bila tranzitna država za migrante v letih 2015-16. Članek prispeva k teoretični razpravi o povezavi med migracijami in varnostjo, saj predlaga dinamičen z migracijami povezan varnostni kontinuum, ki upošteva legitimne varnostne skrbi migrantov, tranzitnih držav in tudi držav gostiteljic. Empirična analiza obravnava poskuse uokvirjanja migrantov v kontekstu sekuritizacije. Izsledki razkrijejo, da so bili tiskani mediji dokaj nevtralni v tem procesu ali pa so celo nasprotovali pretirani sekuritizaciji migrantov, medtem ko so bili politični akterji pristranski. Slovenska vlada je imela vsaj na videz uravnovešen pristop, saj je prepoznala zakonske pravice migrantov, še posebej beguncev na eni strani in upoštevala legitimne varnostne skrbi lastnih državljanov na drugi strani. Vendar pa je v praksi sprejemala določene omejevalne ukrepe, ki so pripomogli k sekuritizaciji migracij. Ključna opozicijska politična stranka pa je bila na čelu procesa sekuritizacije migracij, pri čemer je v svojem diskurzu uporabljala selektivnost, poenostavljanje in pretiravanje. Kot razkrije naša analiza podatkov, je s tem vplivala na slovensko javno mnenje"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-7ECQC06Q","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-7ECQC06Q"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-7ECQC06Q/7cf0cbdb-add0-4922-9a8f-8469eb6e4093/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-7ECQC06Q/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-7ECQC06Q"}}}}