{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-7D5NC4QT/a9698aa6-acef-49e1-9693-0db4812e98bc/HTML","dcterms:extent":"29 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-7D5NC4QT/67ca5a26-ae39-4342-8983-df5cfa81b80b/PDF","dcterms:extent":"379 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-7D5NC4QT/feea592d-3daf-4a2e-bc8e-5c274fbdcfbb/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"23 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2008-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2008"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-7D5NC4QT","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-FQ9JBKO1"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Rehabilitacija (Ljubljana)"}],"dcterms:issued":"2010","dc:creator":["Groleger Sršen, Katja","Jakovljević, Miroljub","Lenhart, Tatjana","Puh, Urška","Vidmar, Gaj"],"dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:2"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"6 strani"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 36-41"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:1580-9315","COBISSID:4097131","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-7D5NC4QT"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerzitetni rehabilitacijski inštitut Slovenije - Soča"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"child"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"diagnostika"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"funkcijske sposobnosti"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"ocenjevanje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"otroci"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"rehabilitacija"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Robotics"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"vocational rehabilitation"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"zanesljivost"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2008-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Vprašalnik za oceno funkcijskih sposobnosti otrok (PEDI)| inter-rater reliability| Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (PEDI)| Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (PEDI)| zanesljivost med ocenjevalci|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Background: The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) is one of the most commonly used assessments for children with disability from 6 months to 7.5 years of age. It can be used to give functional descriptions and ability measures for all chronically ill children. The inter-rater reliability for PEDI in Slovenia has not been evaluated yet. Methods: The aim of this study was to check the inter-rater reliability by interviewing the parents of children with disabilities, physiotherapist and special needs teachers. 36 parents of children with different disabilities from 1.8 to 6.5 years of age (average 4.4, SD 1.3) were interviewed to fill in the PEDI. The children's abilities were also evaluated by a physiotherapist and seven special needs teachers. Results: The range of functional skills scores was wide. Comparison of average scores between physiotherapist and special needs teachers showed no statistically significant differences. Comparison of physiotherapist and special needs teachers with parents showed statistically significant differences. Intraclass correlation between physiotherapist and special needs teachers was very high (mean ICC = 0.99). Intraclass correlations between physiotherapist and parents and between special needs teachers and parents were somewhat lower (ICC = 0.75- 0.97). Conclusions: Highinter-rater reliability between physiotherapist, special needs teachers and parents for PEDI in Slovenia was proved to be high. The Slovenian translation of PEDI is a reliable test for the population of all chronically ill children. PEDI can be used for more objective and exact communication between different therapists and between different institutions"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Izhodišča: Vprašalnik za oceno funkcijskih sposobnosti otrok (Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - PEDI) je eden najpogosteje uporabljanih testov za ocenjevanje funkcijskih sposobnosti otrok, starih od 6 mesecev do 7,5 let. Primeren je za ocenjevanje funkcijskih sposobnosti vseh kronično bolnih otrok. Zanesljivost med ocenjevalci v Sloveniji še ni bila preverjena. Metode: Želeli smo ugotoviti, kakšna je zanesljivost ocenjevanja z vprašalnikom PEDI med različnimi ocenjevalci: fizioterapevtko, specialnimi pedagoginjami in starši vključenih otrok. V raziskavo je bilo vključenih 36 staršev ali skrbnikov otrok z razvojno nevrološko motnjo, starih od 1,8 do 6,5 let (povprečje 4,4; SO 1,3). Otroke je ocenilo več strokovnih sodelavcev - ena fizioterapevtka in sedem specialnih pedagoginj. Rezultati: Pri ocenjevanju z vprašalnikom PEDI smo ugotovili, da so bili v ocenjevanje vključeni otroci z zelo različnimi funkcijskimi sposobnostmi. Primerjava povprečja ocen fizioterapevtke in specialnih pedagoginj ni pokazala statistično značilnih razlik. Primerjava ocen med fizioterapevtko in specialnimi pedagoginjami ter starši je pokazala statistično značilne razlike pri ocenjevanju otrokovih funkcijskih sposobnosti in potrebne pomoči skrbnika. Skladnost ocen med fizioterapevtko in specialnimi pedagoginjami je bila zelo visoka (povprečni ICC = 0,99). Skladnost med fizioterapevtko in starši ter med specialnimi pedagoginjami in starši je bila nekoliko nižja (ICC = 0,75-0,97). V splošnem je zanesljivost ocenjevanja med fizioterapevtko, specialnimi pedagoginjami in starši visoka, iz česar lahko sklepamo, da je vprašalnik PEDI v slovenskem prevodu zanesljivo orodje za ocenjevanje populacije otrok z razvojno nevrološko motnjo. Sklepamo, da ga je mogoče zanesljivo uporabljati za lažje in bolj objektivno sporazumevanje in posredovanje strokovnih informacij med različnimi strokovnimi delavci ter med različnimi ustanovami"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-7D5NC4QT","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-7D5NC4QT"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-7D5NC4QT/67ca5a26-ae39-4342-8983-df5cfa81b80b/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerzitetni rehabilitacijski inštitut RS – Soča"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-7D5NC4QT/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-7D5NC4QT"}}}}