{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-6V3NT8B8/9ee9c795-5eb8-4453-aa38-522d9f6bd8a7/PDF","dcterms:extent":"390 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-6V3NT8B8/1a91e4b6-48ce-443a-a390-e556618477e8/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"0 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1921-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1921"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-6V3NT8B8","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ZCWKSFUC"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Bogoslovni vestnik"}],"dcterms:issued":"2023","dc:creator":"Avsenik Nabergoj, Irena","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:2"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:83"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 339-357"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0006-5722","DOI:10.34291/BV2023/02/Avsenik","COBISSID_HOST:174659331","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-6V3NT8B8"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Teološka fakulteta"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"bralna izkušnja"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"multiple meanings of words"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"reading experience"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"semantic fields of truth"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"semantična polja resnice"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"sinonimi in antonimi"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"structural linguistics"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"strukturalno jezikoslovje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"synonyms and antonyms"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"the role of parallelismus membrorum"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"večpomenskost besed"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"vloga slovničnega paralelizma (parallelismus membrorum)"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1921-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Razvoj metode semantičnih polj ob primeru hebrejskega pojma resnice| Development of the method of semantic fields on the example of the Hebrew concept of truth|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The aim of the article is to show the advantages of the method of analysis of lexical and semantic fields in the field of literature while showing the polysemy of the vocabulary that expresses the semantic aspects of the concept of truth in the Bible. Semantic field analysis considers basic linguistic, literary, and rhetorical structures from the smallest units, such as a line, to larger fragments of various types and genres of texts. Special attention is paid to the constant connections between synonyms and antonyms in the typical biblical parallelismus membrorum and in other basic literary forms. The starting point of any analysis is the consideration of the relationship between synonyms and antonyms with a similar meaning. Literary structures of semantic fields that express the dimensions of the concept of “truth” in the Hebrew Bible include synonyms and antonyms of the root 'mn. The root 'mn is mostly used in the sense of “firmness, steadfastness, trustworthiness, constancy, duration, faithfulness, truth” in relation to God and humanity. From the basic meaning of the root 'mn comes the meaning of faith as trust in someone whom a person considers reliable, trustworthy. In order to understand the entire semantic scope of the concept of truth, in the analysis of the original text we also take into account the use of vocabulary in the most influential translations of the Bible, such as the Septuagint and the Vulgate, in current everyday use and in the development of theological vocabulary in the field of philosophy and theology. The traditional understanding of the term “truth” in everyday speech is focused on conformity with some fact or with the external circumstances of a certain reality and on the evidence of “fairness” in relations between people. The analysis of semantic fields finally helps us to determine what are the specific aspects of the biblical concept of truth compared to ancient and modern secular literature"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Namen članka je pokazati prednosti metode analize leksikalnih in semantičnih polj na področju literature ob prikazu večpomenskosti besedišča, ki v Svetem pismu izraža pomenske vidike pojma resnice. Analiza semantičnih polj upošteva osnovne jezikovne, literarne in retorične strukture – od najmanjših enot, kot je vrstica, do daljših odlomkov različnih besedil različnih vrst in zvrsti. Pri tem posebna pozornost velja stalni zvezi med sinonimi in antonimi v tipičnem bibličnem slovničnem paralelizmu (parallelismus membrorum) in v drugih temeljnih literarnih oblikah. Izhodišče vsake analize je zato upoštevanje razmerja med sinonimi in antonimi s podobnim pomenom. Literarne strukture pomenskih polj, ki izražajo razsežnosti pojma ‚resnica‘ v hebrejskem Svetem pismu, vključujejo sinonime in antonime korena 'mn. Koren 'mn se večinoma uporablja v pomenu ‚trdnost, stanovitnost, zanesljivost, stalnost, trajanje, zvestoba, resnica‘ v odnosu do Boga in človeštva. Iz osnovnega pomena korena 'mn izhaja pomen vere kot zaupanja v nekoga, ki ga ima oseba za zanesljivega in zaupanja vrednega. Da bi razumeli celoten pomenski obseg koncepta resnice, v analizi izvirnega besedila upoštevamo tudi rabo besedišča v najvplivnejših prevodih Svetega pisma, kot sta Septuaginta in Vulgata, v sedanji vsakdanji rabi ter v razvoju teološkega besedišča na področjih filozofije in teologije. Tradicionalno razumevanje izraza ‚resnica‘ v vsakdanji rabi je osredotočeno na skladnost z določenim dejstvom ali z zunanjimi okoliščinami neke realnosti ter na razvidnost ‚poštenosti‘ v odnosih med ljudmi. Analiza semantičnih polj nam končno pomaga ugotoviti, kateri so specifični vidiki bibličnega pojma resnice v primerjavi z antično in novodobno posvetno literaturo"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-6V3NT8B8","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-6V3NT8B8"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-6V3NT8B8/9ee9c795-5eb8-4453-aa38-522d9f6bd8a7/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Teološka fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-6V3NT8B8/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-6V3NT8B8"}}}}