{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-3CVO5WDP/9e-a3dd1-14000d4f4317b--ae4f5bafb738/PDF","dcterms:extent":"709 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-3CVO5WDP/1cbc7095-4f78-418c-93de-1f7c27ab4f89/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"79 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-3CVO5WDP","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-2XUGOISV"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Podjetje in delo"}],"dcterms:issued":"2014","dc:creator":"Hajtnik, Zoran","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:1"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:40"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 153-180"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0353-6521","COBISSID:13611345","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-3CVO5WDP"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"IUS SOFTWARE"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"procesno pravo"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"sodišča"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"sodni postopek"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Raziskava prakse določanja rokov za opravo procesnih dejanj po 286.a členu ZPP in vpliva dolžine določenih rokov na nadaljnji postopek|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The online survey research conducted on the entire population of Slovenian attorneys-at-law found the court in almost half of the cases before the major trial case calls clients to deliver procedural materials for the needs of the process, and sets the deadlines which the attorneys-at-law describe as being at least occasionally too short and that require a lot of effort to carry out an act within the set timeframe. Set deadlines are usually not adapted to the specific case. Attorneys-at-law estimate that tight deadlines are an obstacle to achieve the desired effects, such as speed up the process, delivering of comprehensive pleading and evidence material, to make subsequent work during the hearings easier and to promote the activity of lawyers in the process. They also cause some undesired side effects, in particular the increasing number of applications communicated in the proceedings, the claims grow and the records get thicker, that the parties' pleadings are of poor quality and lack elaboration, and very important create tensions with attorneys-at-law which are then transferred to their subsequent proceedings. The author inquires whether the nature of judicial work enables the perfect use of provision in Article 286(3) of the Civil Procedure Act, and he deals with the practical aspects of the problems which are related to the setting of tight deadlines by the court, and the implementation of process activities imposed by the attorneys-at-law"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"S spletno anketno raziskavo, ki je bila opravljena na celotni populaciji slovenskih odvetnikov, smo ugotovili, da sodišče skoraj v polovici primerov še pred narokom za glavno obravnavo poziva stranke k podajanju procesnega gradiva za potrebe postopka in pri tem določa roke, ki jih odvetniki označujejo kot vsaj občasno prekratke in je zato potrebnega veliko truda, da v roku izvedejo naloženo procesno dejanje. Postavljeni roki praviloma niso prilagojeni konkretni zadevi. Odvetniki menimo, da prekratki roki otežujejo doseganje želenih posledic, kot so pospeševanje postopka, izčrpnejše podajanje trditvenega in dokaznega gradiva, lajšanje poznejšega dela med postopkom na narokih in povečevanje aktivnosti odvetnikov v postopku, ter povzročajo nekatere neželene posledice, zlasti s tem, da se povečuje število vlog, izmenjanih v postopku, da se trditve razbohotijo in spisi debelijo, da so vloge strank nekakovostne in premalo domišljene in zelo pomembno da ustvarjajo pri odvetnikih napetost, ki se prenaša v poznejši postopek. Avtor se sprašuje, ali narava sodniškega dela omogoča idealno uporabo določila tretjega odstavka 286. a člena ZPP, in se ukvarja s praktičnimi vidiki težav, povezanih z odmerjanjem kratkih rokov s strani sodišča, ter izvajanjem naloženih procesnih aktivnosti s strani odvetnikov"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-3CVO5WDP","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-3CVO5WDP"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-3CVO5WDP/9e-a3dd1-14000d4f4317b--ae4f5bafb738/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-3CVO5WDP/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-3CVO5WDP"}}}}