{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-36BYWHOK/4465ebb2-a215-4450-9e2d-a222081c3261/PDF","dcterms:extent":"353 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-36BYWHOK/1a8c8b60-2df5-4a4a-947a-794f83c006e4/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"48 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2018-2024","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2018"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2024"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-36BYWHOK","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-QVBBDN4R"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Analiza (Ljubljana)"}],"dcterms:issued":"2024","dc:creator":"Todorović, Tadej","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:1"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:28"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 103-121"}],"dc:identifier":["DOI:10.18690/analiza.28.1.103-122.2024","ISSN:1408-2969","COBISSID_HOST:228321283","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-36BYWHOK"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"ekvivalenca"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"equivalence"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"filozofija jezika"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"indeterminacy of reference"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"indeterminacy of translation"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"language"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"nedoločenost prevoda"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"nedoločenost reference"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Quine"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2018-2024"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Je Quineov problem nedoločenosti prevoda in reference relevanten za lingvistične in prevodoslovne teorije?|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The paper examines the concept of equivalence in translation theory, exploring its various interpretations and criticisms. It analyses different approaches to equivalence in the literature, including Catford's notion of equivalence, Nida and Taber's formal and dynamic equivalence, and Koller's five types of equivalence. The paper then considers critiques of equivalence, focusing on the critiques based on the influence of Quine's indeterminacy of translation and reference. It argues that while Quine's problem challenges the notion of meaning-based equivalence, other forms of equivalence remain viable, although accepting Quine's position necessitates the elimination of meaning itself. Finally, the paper weighs the implications of these different perspectives on translation theory. While accepting Quine's view challenges some forms of equivalence, it does not completely invalidate the concept. Other types of equivalence, such as those focused on function or effect, remain valid. However, accepting Quine's view requires eliminating the concept of meaning, which has profound implications for the field of translation studies and linguistics in general"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"V pričujočem članku zasleduje avtor dva cilja –najprej podati delovno definicijo terorizma, nato pa kritično ovrednotiti argumentacijske strategije, ki vodijo do njegove skoraj soglasne moralne obsodbe. V zvezi s prvim zagovarja potrebam moralnega ovrednotenja prikrojeno definicijo terorizma kot ne-razlikovalne uporabe nasilja – ali resno mišljene grožnje z njim – z namenom/ciljem (od oblasti) izsiliti bolj ali manj korenite politične oz. družbene spremembe. V zvezi z drugim priznava, da si teroristi z načrtnim fizičnim in psihičnim nasiljem nad civilisti naprtijo težko moralno breme, a dokazuje, da terorizem v tem ni pomembno drugačen od drugih, praviloma toleriranih in neredko celo slavljenih in občudovanih vrst politično motiviranega nasilja, od oboroženih uporov in revolucij do državljanskih in meddržavnih vojn. Ali se bo terorizem pod navedenim moralnim bremenom nazadnje zlomil ali ne, bo v prvi vrsti odvisno od konkretne utemeljitve, tolmačenja in uporabe načela imunosti civilistov – ta naloga pa se popremisleku izkaže za precej trši oreh, kot dajeta slutiti njegova samoumevnost in vsesplošna popularnost. In končno, za enačenje terorizma in ekstremizma ni prepričljivih razlogov, sploh če pomislimo, koliko strpnejši smo do drugih pojavnih oblik politično motiviranega nasilja, ki so terorizmu v najboljšem primeru moralno enakovredne ali pa še to ne"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-36BYWHOK","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-36BYWHOK"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-36BYWHOK/4465ebb2-a215-4450-9e2d-a222081c3261/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Društvo za analitično filozofijo in filozofijo znanosti"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-36BYWHOK/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-36BYWHOK"}}}}