{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2ULBK7II/38a45dc4-f64d-4c71-9856-16801d7c4f57/PDF","dcterms:extent":"402 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2ULBK7II/1bfad197-4841-4c83-b176-3fbcb7b14d7b/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"0 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1921-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1921"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-2ULBK7II","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ZCWKSFUC"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Bogoslovni vestnik"}],"dcterms:issued":"2023","dc:creator":"Roszak, Piotr","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:3"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:83"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 567-579"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0006-5722","DOI:10.34291/BV2023/03/Roszak","COBISSID_HOST:179188739","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-2ULBK7II"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Teološka fakulteta"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Božje ideje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Divine ideas"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"eksemplarizem"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"exemplarism"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"intellect"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"razum"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"soteriologija"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"soteriology"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Tomaž Akvinski"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"volja"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"will"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1921-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Aquinas on the being in God and in proper nature| Akvinski o biti v Bogu in lastni naravi|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Among the many debates concerning God’s relation to the world, the teaching of the existence of the idea of created beings in the eternal Word is noteworthy. This brings the question of exemplarity, which denotes not only the similarity of the effect to the cause, but also the asymmetrical relationship that exists between the Creator and creation, which is one of transcendence. This opens up the question of how creatures exist in their own nature and what epistemological significance it has to know things in the light of the Word. God is not the first but the last object of human knowledge. For Thomas Aquinas, this opens up a number of interesting questions about the cognition of things in God, and thus guides soteriological and eschatological reflection. For Aquinas, being in God would mean that there is dependence in existence because God conserves the esse of all things, but also that the creature is related to the divine essence when it is in God as in the power of the agent or as in the knower. At the same time, although the existence in God, first as an idea, is more perfect, because of God’s perfection, nevertheless, to exist in own nature is more perfect from another perspective. This seems to be a very important claim against the occasionalist approach, according to which a being does not have its own nature because God acts in its place. For Aquinas, God’s respect for the nature of created beings marked the proper understanding of divine action in the world"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Med številnimi razpravami o Božjem odnosu do sveta velja omeniti nauk o obstoju ideje o ustvarjenih bitjih v večni Besedi. S tem se poraja vprašanje eksemplarizma, ki ne označuje le podobnosti učinka z vzrokom, temveč tudi asimetrično razmerje, ki obstaja med Stvarnikom in transcendentnim stvarstvom. To odpira vprašanje, kako stvarstva obstajajo v svoji lastni naravi in kakšen epistemološki pomen ima spoznavanje stvari v luči Besede. Bog ni prvi, temveč zadnji predmet človeškega spoznanja. Za Tomaža Akvinskega to odpira številna zanimiva vprašanja o spoznavanju stvari v Bogu in usmerjanju soteriološkega in eshatološkega razmisleka. Biti v Bogu bi za Akvinskega pomenilo, da v obstoju obstaja odvisnost, ker Bog ohranja esse vseh stvari – pa tudi, da je bitje povezano z Božjim bistvom, kadar je v Bogu kot v moči agensa ali kot v spoznavalcu. Hkrati je sicer obstoj v Bogu (najprej kot ideja) popolnejši zaradi Božje popolnosti, vendar pa je obstoj v lastni naravi popolnejši z drugega vidika. Zdi se, da je to proti okazionalističnem pristopu – po katerem bitje nima lastne narave, ker namesto njega deluje Bog – zelo pomembna trditev. Za Akvinskega je Božje spoštovanje narave ustvarjenih bitij zaznamovalo pravilno razumevanje Božjega delovanja v svetu"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-2ULBK7II","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-2ULBK7II"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2ULBK7II/38a45dc4-f64d-4c71-9856-16801d7c4f57/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Teološka fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2ULBK7II/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2ULBK7II"}}}}