{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2U4D98W6/288afe87-8838-46b0-97c4-bbb317fa2b91/PDF","dcterms:extent":"359 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2U4D98W6/2915b197-9976-4cfb-8dcc-4824fb28def7/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"0 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2010-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2010"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-2U4D98W6","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-PFDPDLU7"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Dignitas (Ljubljana)"}],"dcterms:issued":"2013","dc:creator":"Goršek, Anita","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:59/60"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 165-181"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:1408-9653","COBISSID:513732216","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-2U4D98W6"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Fakulteta za slovenske in mednarodne študije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"človekove pravice"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"človekovo dostojanstvo"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"human dignity"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"načelo demokratičnosti"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"otroci"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"the principle of democracy"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"the protection of human rights"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"totalitarian system"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"totalitarni sistem"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"varstvo človekovih pravic"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2010-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pravni položaj otrok med paternalizmom in avtonomijo|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"This article is exploring the relationship between protective norms, limiting children's liberty and rules enabling children to express their opinions. These two conflicting sets of rules cause children to be torn between paternalism, whereby their interests are determined by adults, and autonomy, which enables children to set their own interests. Described ambivalence can be observed in numerous regulated areas of social life that pertain to children or should perhaps concern them more than they do presently. The author discusses the appropriate boundary between paternalistic and autonomy protecting regulation, whereby she in particular explores a few problem areas with special regard to autonomous children. Reviewing pertinent civil law legislation on medical decision-making and parental disputes as well as public law right to vote, she notices that in civil law children's emerging autonomy is protected to a certain degree but the result is still not adequate. Reviewed public law area on the other hand is far more stringent, resting seemingly on the presumption that children are not capable of discernment. Author deems that certain restrictions are not proportionate. Protection of children and public order concerns are necessary considerations but they cannot justify all legal limitations. A more flexible approach would achieve this aim while simultaneously respect the minors' autonomy"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Prispevek obravnava razmerje med pravnimi normami, ki otroke varujejo z omejevanjem svobodnega odločanja, ter pravili, ki otrokom omogočajo izraziti svoje mnenje. Zaradi teh nasprotujočih si načel so otroci razpeti med paternalizmom, ko o njihovih interesih odločajo odrasli, in avtonomijo, ki jim omogoča, da svoje interese določajo sami. Ta dihotomija je prisotna na številnih področjih pravno urejenega družbenega življenja, kjer bi otroci morali biti udeleženi bolj, kot jim omogoča veljavna zakonodaja. Avtorica obravnava vprašanje ustreznosti meje med paternalistično ureditvijo in zakonodajo, ki varuje otrokovo avtonomijo. Pri tem posamezna področja obravnava z vidika odnosa do avtonomnih otrok. Po preučitvi zakonodaje o odločanju o zdravljenju ter v starševskih sporih ugotavlja, da pravni red do določene mere priznava otrokovo porajajočo se avtonomijo, vendar z rezultatom še ne moremo biti zadovoljni. Nasprotno pa so obravnavana pravila o volilni pravici strožja in se očitno opirajo na idejo o zmanjšani razsodnosti otrok. Avtorica meni, da določene omejitve ne ustrezajo sorazmernosti. Priznava, da sta vidika varstva otrok in javnega reda utemeljena, vendar ne moreta upravičiti prav vseh omejitev. Bolj fleksibilen pristop bi takšnim zahtevam zadostil, hkrati pa bi upošteval tudi avtonomijo mladoletnikov"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-2U4D98W6","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-2U4D98W6"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2U4D98W6/288afe87-8838-46b0-97c4-bbb317fa2b91/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Fakulteta za slovenske in mednarodne študije v Kranju"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2U4D98W6/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2U4D98W6"}}}}