{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2QGQ0067/4f55-5-5-c428-01041c5c5970f8c90f44c8/PDF","dcterms:extent":"167 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2QGQ0067/f251ccc5-4584-4f48-8f40-0595c1c59070/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"53 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-2QGQ0067","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-2XUGOISV"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Podjetje in delo"}],"dcterms:issued":"2022","dc:creator":"Čarni, Martin","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:48"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:8"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 1259-1278"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0353-6521","COBISSID_HOST:134321155","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-2QGQ0067"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Gospodarski vestnik"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Inštitut za delo pri Pravni fakulteti"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza Društev pravnikov v gospodarstvu Slovenije"}],"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"adversarial principle"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"dokazni postopek"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"due care"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"evidentiary procedure"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"litigation procedure"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"načelo ekonomičnosti postopka"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"načelo hitrosti postopka"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"načelo kontradiktornosti"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"načelo materialne resnice"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"new facts and evidence"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"nova dejstva in dokazi"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"potrebna skrbnost"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pravdni postopek"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"principle of material truth"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"principle of procedural economy"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"principle of procedural speed"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"sistem prekluzij"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"system of preclusion"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Presoja izjem glede naknadnega navajanja dejstev oziroma predlaganja dokazov|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The article examines the exceptions to the prohibition of stating new facts or proposing new evidence in litigation procedures (system of preclusions) from the case law perspective. Initially, the author presents the starting points and the legislative regulation of the system of preclusions. Afterwards, the author, through an analysis of the case law, shows the essential circumstances that the litigating parties and the courts shall consider when applying the legal standards that determine exceptions to the prohibition of stating new facts or proposing new evidence in litigation procedures. In doing so, the author draws attention to some situations that often arise in litigation procedures. In the end, based on the presented analysis of the case law, the author presents general findings regarding the use of the system of preclusions and the required actions of litigating parties"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Prispevek obravnava izjeme od prepovedi navajanja novih dejstev oziroma predlaganja novih dokazov v pravdnem postopku (sistem prekluzij) z vidika sodne prakse. Avtor uvodoma predstavi osnovna izhodišča in zakonodajno ureditev sistema prekluzij, v nadaljevanju pa na podlagi analize sodne prakse pokaže bistvene okoliščine, ki jih morajo pravdne stranke in sodišča upoštevati pri uporabi pravnih standardov, s katerimi so določene izjeme od prepovedi navajanja novih dejstev oziroma predlaganja novih dokazov v pravdnem postopku. Pri tem opozori na presojo nekaterih za pravdne postopke značilnih situacij. Na koncu na podlagi analize sodne prakse predstavi splošne ugotovitve glede uporabe sistema prekluzij in potrebnih ravnanj pravdnih strank"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-2QGQ0067","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-2QGQ0067"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2QGQ0067/4f55-5-5-c428-01041c5c5970f8c90f44c8/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2QGQ0067/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2QGQ0067"}}}}