205 KB46 KB201320252023Žnidaršič Skubic, Viktorijaletnik:49številka:6/7str. 949-962ISSN:0353-6521COBISSID:168479747URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-2KRVEFGJslLEXPERAPodjetje in delonekrivdna odškodninska shemaObjektivna odgovornostodškodninska odgovornostodškodninski sistemiprimerjalno pravoreformeZdravstvoNekrivdna odškodninska odgovornost| primerno zdravilo za slovensko zdravstvo ali njegova stranpot?|In the article, the author discusses the issue of tort liability and compensation for malpractice in healthcare through the prism of potential solutions in Slovenia de lege ferenda. One of the possibilities offered is the implementation of the no-fault compensation system, which has been known for many years in Scandinavian countries and in New Zealand. In the article, the author points out its fundamental advantages and disadvantages, as well as possible alternatives to the relatively revolutionary changes that the latter brings. She presents the regulations in France and Great Britain, which took the path of gradual reforms and mainly supplemented and improved the existing system of classic system of fault liability, France partly also by adding individual elements of the no-fault compensation scheme. The author points out that in addition to the reform of compensation law, a comprehensive reform of professional responsibility in healthcare is also necessary in Slovenia, together with the modernisation of the system of quality and safety. Without the latter, even changes in the field of tort liability will not bring the desired results. She advocates for a prudent and interest-balanced reform, with full awareness of the specifics of the Slovenian legal systemV prispevku avtorica obravnava problematiko odškodninske odgovornosti v zdravstvu glede na potencialne rešitve v Sloveniji de lege ferenda. Ena od možnosti, ki se ponuja, je uveljavitev nekrivdnega odškodninskega sistema, ki ga že več let poznajo v skandinavskih državah in na Novi Zelandiji. Avtorica poudari njegove temeljne prednosti in pomanjkljivosti, prav tako pa tudi nadomestne možnosti za relativno revolucionarne spremembe, ki jih ta prinaša. Predstavi ureditvi v Franciji in Veliki Britaniji, ki sta ubrali pot postopnih reform in sta obstoječi sistem klasične krivdne odškodninske odgovornosti predvsem dopolnili in izboljšali, Francija deloma tudi z dodajanjem posamičnih elementov nekrivdne odškodninske sheme. Avtorica opozarja, da je v Sloveniji poleg reforme odškodninskega prava potrebna tudi celovita reforma profesionalne odgovornosti v zdravstvu, skupaj s posodobitvijo sistema kakovosti in varnosti. Brez navedenega tudi spremembe na področju odškodninske odgovornosti ne bodo prinesle želenih rezultatov. Zavzema se za premišljeno in interesno uravnoteženo reformo ob polnem zavedanju specifik slovenskega pravnega sistemaTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of Slovenia