71 KB12625 KB68 KB199020252004Janko Spreizer, Alenkaštevilka:45str. 202-225ISSN:0353-2720ISSN:0354-0286COBISSID:9500749URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-2EWD85NNslInstitute for Ethnic StudiesInštitut za narodnostna vprašanjaRazprave in gradivo - Inštitut za narodnostna vprašanja (1990)etnična identitetaRomiSloveniaSlovenijasocialna antropologija"Avtohtoni" in "neavtohtoni" Romi v Sloveniji| socialna konstrukcija teritorialnega razmejevanja identitet|The contribution opens with the question of how is culture connected to space and which is the role played by different representatives of power with regards to the construction of Roma collectiveness in Slovenia. Based on this starting point, the article analyses the field of knowledge known as "Romology". The present analysis shows which social actors of power established the difference between those Roma who are represented as "autochtonous" and confined to one specific territories, claimed to be "autochtonous areas of settlement", and the so-called "non-autochtonous" Roma.The analysis demonstrates that the above-mentioned studies base their conclusions on the primordial and biological conceptualisations of culture, allegedly "naturally" bound to certain spaces and territories. Relying on the collected ethnography, the author crucially depicts the process, which generates the discourse of "autochtony" and "non-autochtony" in the relation between the Roma, national Romany policy, and academic tradition, which represents itself as "Romology", "Slovenian national question" or "ethnic studies."Izhodišče prispevka je vprašanje, kako se kultura povezuje s prostorom in kakšno vlogo imajo pri tem različni reprezentanti moči, na primeru konstruiranja skupinskosti Romov v Sloveniji. S tega izhodišča članek analizira polje vednosti, poznamo kot "romologija". Analiza pokaže, kako in kateri socialni akterji moči so vzpostavljali razliko med Romi, ki jih reprezentirajo kot "avtohtone" in priklenjene na določene teritorije, za katere trdijo, da so njihova "avtohtona območja poselitve", ter med t.i. "neavtohtonimi" Romi. Ob tem analiza pokaže, da omenjene študije temeljijo na primordialnih, biologističnih konceptualizacijah kulture, ki da so domnevno "naravno" vezane na določene prostore in teritorije. Avtorica ob podajanju etnografije kritično oriše proces, v katerem nastaja diskurz o "avtohtonosti" in "neavtohtonosti" v odnosu med Romi, državno romsko politiko, in strokovno tradicijo, ki se reprezentira bodisi kot "romologija" bodisi kot "slovensko narodnostno vprašanje" ali "etnične študije"TEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaInštitut za narodnostna vprašanja