<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2A5GM6YE/3a22eaac-4e16-4b47-be56-a1304ffe7602/HTML"><dcterms:extent>74 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2A5GM6YE/21ea2ffb-95d7-473d-8abb-84ee13e36613/PDF"><dcterms:extent>2343 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2A5GM6YE/b4851b12-9ed7-4e6a-a21a-c8496100b079/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>59 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2006-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2006</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-2A5GM6YE"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/urn:nbn:si:spr-hthivfa7" /><dcterms:issued>2006</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Milfelner, Borut</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mumel, Damijan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Snoj, Boris</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">15 strani</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:5/6</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:52</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 37-51</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0547-3101</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:8964380</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-2A5GM6YE</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Društvo ekonomistov Maribor</dc:publisher><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Ekonomski center Maribor</dc:publisher><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Naše gospodarstvo</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">marketing</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">multivariantna analiza</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">regresijska analiza</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">strategija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">trženje</dc:subject><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q39809" /><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2006-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Metaanaliza dveh pristopov k raziskovanju kompleksnih marketinških problemov| Meta-analysis of two research method in marketing|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The main purpose of the article is to answer the question concerning the differences that can occur when two multivariate research methods (multivariate regression analysis and structural equation modelling) are used to solve the same complex marketing problem. Both methods are used in marketing for measurement of a relationship between variables. The basis for meta-analysis is a complex marketing problem in terms of which we asses the impact of marketing assets and marketing capabilities on several aspects of firm performance. Comparison of alternative methods suggests that important differences in relationship strength (regression coefficients) and statistical significance can occur. This can result in differences regarding rejection of hypotheses and, in turn, in interpretation of findings</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Namen članka je odgovoriti na vprašanje, kakšne so razlike v reševanju kompleksnega marketinškega problema, če izberemo dva multivariatna raziskovalna pristopa - multivariatno regresijsko analizo in modeliranje strukturnih enačb (angl. structural equation modeling - SEM). Obe metodi v marketingu uporabljamo za merjenje moči vpliva med spremenljivkami. Metaanalizo izvajamo na osnovi kompleksnega marketinškega problema, v okviru katerega ugotavljamo vpliv marketinških virov na različne vidike uspešnosti podjetja. Ugotavljamo, da prihaja pri uporabi omenjenih dveh metod do nekaterih pomembnih razlik v rezultatih, predvsem z vidika moči vpliva posamezne spremenljivke na drugo (regresijski koeficienti) in statistične pomembnosti vpliva, ter tudi pri sprejemanju ali zavračanju hipotez</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-2A5GM6YE"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-2A5GM6YE" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2A5GM6YE/21ea2ffb-95d7-473d-8abb-84ee13e36613/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2A5GM6YE/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2A5GM6YE" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>