610 KB0 KB2026Baschung, LukasKouadio, Armand Briceletnik:24številka:iss. 1str. 7-32DOI:10.17573/cepar.2026.1.01ISSN:2591-2240COBISSID_HOST:281848579URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-29W652NJen= University of Ljubljana PressCentral European Public Administration Reviewbirokracijadejavnikijavne organizacijejavnoodpornostodprti podatki javnega sektorjaresiliencesoustvarjanjespodbujevalni dejavnikizasebnoTo what extent do resilience antecedents differ between public administrations and private enterprises?| a literature review|Purpose: Given their differences in missions, goals, governance, resources, and professional ethics, public and private organisations are affected differently by disruptive events such as the COVID-19 crisis. As a result, the factors supporting their respective resilience may also vary. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of resilience antecedents in public administrations based on a systematic literature review of public administration and management scholarship, and compares them with resilience factors in private enterprises. In doing so, it examines the extent to which resilience antecedents differ between the two types of organisation. The related results should constitute a sound basis for the further development of public administrations’ resilience and related research. Design/methodology/approach: The literature used in this systematic review was selected by focusing on the Web of Science (WoS), Google Scholar, and fifty top-ranked public management and management journals, chosen mainly according to their Scopus ranking. The search specifically focused on public administrations, narrowly defined as entities endowed with political authority in their field of activity, thus excluding autonomous public organisations, such as hospitals, in order to avoid unnecessary complexity. The studies included in the review also needed to address resilience in terms of the capacity to “absorb, overcome, and recover” from external or internal shocks. The data collection process was guided by the PRISMA workflow, which helped to minimise bias and ensure that only the most relevant studies were selected for in-depth analysis. Findings: In addition to identifying many common resilience factors at the organisational, team, and individual levels, mostly related to financial, material, and human resources, this review reveals key elements specific to public administrations, such as legal and bureaucratic constraints. It is argued that, according to the dominant public management paradigm, the development of this antecedent may be challenging. Furthermore, the capability to mobilise a network of partners to solve crisis-related issues seems to be particularly important for public organisations. Indeed, in the case of public administrations, cooperation with other public and private actors is essential not only for their own survival and continued functioning as organisations but also, given their societal mission, for leading the response to a crisis. Academic contribution to the field: Based on the existing scientific literature, this article clarifies the extent to which resilience antecedents differ between public administrations and private enterprises. Although general differences between the public and private sectors are well known, no such comparison has been made to date with regard to resilience factors. In doing so, it creates a solid basis for further empirical research on the numerous research gaps identified. Originality/significance/value: There are a number of factors that organisations need to work on if they wish to improve their resilience, regardless of their legal form. However, this article also identifies the resilience antecedents that are particularly important for public administrations and require specific attention from public managersNamen: zaradi razlik v poslanstvu, ciljih, upravljanju, virih in poklicni etiki krizni dogodki, kot je pandemija covida-19, različno vplivajo na javne in zasebne organizacije. Zato se lahko razlikujejo tudi dejavniki, ki podpirajo njihovo odpornost. Članek na podlagi sistematičnega pregleda literature s področja javne uprave in menedžmenta podaja celovito analizo dejavnikov odpornosti v javnih upravah ter jih primerja z dejavniki odpornosti v zasebnih podjetjih. Tako preučuje, koliko se dejavniki odpornosti razlikujejo med tema dvema vrstama organizacij. Ugotovitve naj bi pomenile trdno podlago za nadaljnji razvoj odpornosti javnih uprav in z njo povezanih raziskav. Zasnova/metodologija/pristop: literatura, vključena v ta sistematični pregled, je bila izbrana na podlagi iskanja v bazah Web of Science (WoS), Google Scholar ter v petdesetih najvišje uvrščenih revijah s področja javnega menedžmenta in menedžmenta, izbranih predvsem glede na njihovo uvrstitev v Scopusu. Iskanje se je posebej osredotočilo na javne uprave, ozko opredeljene kot entitete s politično avtoriteto na svojem področju delovanja, pri čemer so bile zaradi izogibanja nepotrebni kompleksnosti izključene avtonomne javne organizacije, kot so bolnišnice. Študije, vključene v pregled, so morale odpornost obravnavati tudi v smislu zmožnosti “Absorb-Overcome-Recover” ob zunanjih ali notranjih pretresih. Zbiranje podatkov je potekalo po smernicah PRISMA, kar je pripomoglo k zmanjšanju pristranskosti in zagotovilo, da so bile za poglobljeno analizo izbrane le najrelevantnejše študije. Ugotovitve: poleg številnih skupnih dejavnikov odpornosti na organizacijski, timski in individualni ravni, večinoma povezanih s finančnimi, materialnimi in človeškimi viri, pregled razkriva tudi ključne elemente, značilne za javne uprave, kot so pravne in birokratske omejitve. Avtorji trdijo, da je glede na prevladujočo paradigmo javnega menedžmenta razvoj tega dejavnika lahko zahteven. Poleg tega se zdi sposobnost mobiliziranja mreže partnerjev za reševanje vprašanj, povezanih s krizami, posebej pomembna za javne organizacije. V primeru javnih uprav sodelovanje z drugimi javnimi in zasebnimi akterji namreč ni bistveno le za lastno preživetje in neprekinjeno organizacijsko delovanje, temveč zaradi njihovega družbenega poslanstva tudi za vodenje odziva na krizo. Akademski prispevek k področju: na podlagi obstoječe znanstvene literature članek pojasnjuje, koliko se dejavniki odpornosti razlikujejo med javnimi upravami in zasebnimi podjetji. Čeprav so splošne razlike med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem dobro poznane, taka primerjava dejavnikov odpornosti doslej še ni bila opravljena. Članek tako ustvarja trdno podlago za nadaljnje empirične raziskave številnih ugotovljenih raziskovalnih vrzeli. Izvirnost/pomen/vrednost: obstaja več dejavnikov, na katerih morajo organizacije delati, če želijo izboljšati svojo odpornost, ne glede na pravno obliko. Vendar članek opredeljuje tudi tiste dejavnike odpornosti, ki so posebej pomembni za javne uprave in zato zahtevajo posebno pozornost javnih menedžerjevTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za upravo