<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-23N9A8FN/4122cb11-9de5-4efd-b4f9-adbad2b4c57e/PDF"><dcterms:extent>868 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-23N9A8FN/1cb12b27-1dbf-4c68-9fe8-308b05d5c0c5/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>0 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2014-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2014</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-23N9A8FN"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-QCV9XF2O" /><dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Feng, J. Y.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kang, Y. X.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zhang, W. J.</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:20</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:4</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 61-74</dc:format><dc:identifier>DOI:10.14743/apem2025.1.527</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1854-6250</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:265279235</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-23N9A8FN</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za strojništvo, Inštitut za proizvodno strojništvo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Advances in production engineering and management</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">blockchain adoption</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">competitive collaboration</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">food supply chains</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">game theory</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">operation strategy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">prehrambne nabavne verige</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">spillover effects</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">teorija iger</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">upravljanje nabavnih verig</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">veriženje blokov</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2014-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Independent vs. collaborative blockchain research and development| operational decisions in food supply chains|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">As blockchain increasingly demonstrates advantages in enhancing consumer trust and reducing collaborative production costs in food supply chains, more food companies are developing blockchain-based supply chain management platforms. However, in a complex and competitive supply chain environment, food companies face critical operational management challenges in selecting appropriate blockchain R&amp;D approaches and determining optimal R&amp;D levels. This study examines two competing food companies deciding on their optimal food production and blockchain R&amp;D levels. We first established a benchmark model without blockchain adoption. Then, we constructed supply chain operation models for both independent and collaborative blockchain R&amp;D scenarios. By comparing equilibrium decisions across different models, we derived the optimal blockchain R&amp;D model and operational strategies in food supply chains. Furthermore, we extended our analysis to consider asymmetric food substitution scenarios. Our findings revealed that independent blockchain R&amp;D tends to increase equilibrium food production and is more suitable for premium food supply chains. Conversely, collaborative blockchain R&amp;D significantly enhanced overall supply chain profitability. As spillover effects increase, food companies are likely to favor independent blockchain R&amp;D to achieve higher R&amp;D levels and stronger market competitiveness. Additionally, we demonstrated that blockchain R&amp;D levels are influenced by food substitutability and quality credibility</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-23N9A8FN"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-23N9A8FN" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-23N9A8FN/4122cb11-9de5-4efd-b4f9-adbad2b4c57e/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za strojništvo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-23N9A8FN/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-23N9A8FN" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>