{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-1Y1IN2J8/d518ae56-fa21-4c8b-93c9-ef683334231f/PDF","dcterms:extent":"987 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-1Y1IN2J8/2dcda7aa-104c-4291-9220-af7a63234e05/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"46 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2024","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2024"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-1Y1IN2J8","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-CFT6PFGK"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pravnik"}],"dcterms:issued":"2014","dc:creator":"Gorkič, Primož","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:5/6"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:69"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 373-389, 415-416"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0032-6976","COBISSID:3881928","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-1Y1IN2J8"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza društev pravnikov Slovenije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"človekove pravice"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"dokazi"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"human rights"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"kazenski postopek"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"kazniva dejanja"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"storilci"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2024"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Edicijska dolžnost domnevnega storilca v kazenskem postopku|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Central issue of the paper is whether defendants in criminal procedures may be compelled to produce documents, data or other tangible evidence upon orders by criminal procedure bodies. Specifically, the article examines, whether privilege against self-incrimination and the right to silence protect against such compulsion. The problem is tackled on different levels. First, the author attempts to deal with the problem at the level of statutory provisions in the Criminal Procedure Act. The wording of the statute's general duty to produce is so general, that it suggests that such compulsion is, indeed, possible under the Act's provisions. Second approach deals with the case-law of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia. Its case-law, too, can be interpreted as being in favour of such compulsion. However, the Court has not yet faced the issue directly. Quite a different conclusion, however, can be reached when we deal with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. It shows that it may be necessary to mitigate the strict provisions in the Criminal Procedure Act and refrain from using compulsory measures against defendants that refuse to produce documents, data or tangible evidence upon request of the authorities"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Tema prispevka je edicijska dolžnost domnevnega storilca v kazenskem postopku. Ključno vprašanje je, ali privilegij zoper samoobtožbo prepoveduje prisiljevanje osumljenca ali obdolženca k izročanju listin, predmetov ali podatkov organom kazenskega postopka. V prispevku avtor to vprašanje analizira z več vidikov. Pri analizi besedila Zakona o kazenskem postopku ugotavlja, da gola jezikovna razlaga vodi v sklep, da je tudi domnevni storilec dolžan izročiti zahtevane predmete, listine in podatke. Podobno velja, če analiziramo relevantne odločbe Ustavnega sodišča Republike Slovenije. Sodišče se s tem vprašanjem sicer še ni soočilo, je pa zavzelo stališča, ki govorijo v prid veljavnosti edicijske dolžnosti tudi za osumljenca oziroma obdolženca. Analiza judikature Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in primerjalna analiza izbranih ureditev pa pokaže, da bo treba tudi v slovenskem pravu zavzeti stališče, da privilegij zoper samoobtožbo prepoveduje vsaj prisilo zoper domnevnega storilca, če se ta ne odzove na zahtevo, naj organom postopka izroči zahtevane listine, predmete ali podatke"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-1Y1IN2J8","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-1Y1IN2J8"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-1Y1IN2J8/d518ae56-fa21-4c8b-93c9-ef683334231f/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-1Y1IN2J8/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-1Y1IN2J8"}}}}