{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-155SRJSY/7c278ec7-cec1-4beb-b112-7384d10192bf/PDF","dcterms:extent":"1655 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-155SRJSY/1c921dd9-c287-4430-9794-96a26f73d0ed/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"79 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2024","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2024"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-155SRJSY","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-CFT6PFGK"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pravnik"}],"dcterms:issued":"2014","dc:creator":"Prostor, Jerneja","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:1/2"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:69"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 33-60, 135-136"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0032-6976","COBISSID:13617745","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-155SRJSY"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza društev pravnikov Slovenije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"gospodarske družbe"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"statusno pravo"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2024"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Razdružitev statutarnega in dejanskega sedeža slovenske družbe|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The authoress raises the question of the consequences of the real seat theory, which is accepted in Slovenian law for domestic companies. Slovenian company must comply with the principle of territorial coincide of the companys seat. The breach of this principle with the cross-border transfer of the companys real seat causes the company to lose a legal personality under the Slovenian law. The authoress opens up the question of the eventual duty and method of verification of the companys real seat by the registration authorities. For the practical reasons and economic motives she suggests the real seat theory to be abolished and thereby Slovenian companies to be allowed to transfer solely their real seat to another Member State. In the light of the relevant case law of The Court of Justice of the EU the authoress emphasizes that the cross-border transfer of companys registered office must be permitted on the basis of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU. Nevertheless, the Fourteenth Company law Directive should be adopted for the reasons of legal certainty. Furthermore, the authoress referring to the relevant case law of The Court of Justice of the EU from the viewpoint of the home Member State concludes that irrespective of the real seat theory Slovenian companies should be allowed to transfer merely their registered office to another Member State"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"V prispevku avtorica obravnava vprašanje posledic teorije dejanskega sedeža, ki je v slovenskem pravu sprejeta za domače družbe. Slovenska družba (s statutarnim sedežem v Sloveniji) mora izpolnjevati načelo teritorialne skladnosti sedeža družbe. Če to načelo prekrši in v Sloveniji nima (več) dejanskega sedeža, ji po slovenskem pravu, tj. pravu njene ustanovitve, ni več priznana pravna subjektiviteta. Pomisleke vzbujata morebitna dolžnost in način preverjanja lokacije dejanskega sedeža družbe s strani registrskih organov. Ob tem avtorica zaradi vrste praktičnih razlogov in ekonomskih vzgibov zaključi, da bi bilo treba za slovenske družbe teorijo dejanskega sedeža odpraviti in jim s tem dopustiti čezmejni prenos zgolj dejanskega sedeža. V prispevku je ob sklicevanju na sodno prakso Sodišča EU poudarjeno, da obstaja pravna podlaga za čezmejni prenos statutarnega (in dejanskega) sedeža družbe v določbah Pogodbe o delovanju EU, vendar je treba v luči zagotavljanja pravne varnosti kljub temu čim prej sprejeti Štirinajsto direktivo s področja prava družb. Avtorica prav tako ob sklicevanju na sodno prakso Sodišča EU sprejme stališče, da Slovenija ne glede na teorijo dejanskega sedeža slovenskim družbam praviloma ne bi smela preprečevati čezmejnega prenosa zgolj statutarnega sedeža"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-155SRJSY","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-155SRJSY"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-155SRJSY/7c278ec7-cec1-4beb-b112-7384d10192bf/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-155SRJSY/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-155SRJSY"}}}}