{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-0IYG7BJZ/37ce2-5c4ca86404e7ed94c8f-e65-03c28-/PDF","dcterms:extent":"322 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-0IYG7BJZ/c7ce640f-e542-4c2d-860e-e5a8478c3c93/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"49 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-0IYG7BJZ","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-2XUGOISV"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Podjetje in delo"}],"dcterms:issued":"2013","dc:creator":["Strban, Grega","Weber, Nana"],"dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:2"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:39"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 342-357"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0353-6521","COBISSID:13136977","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-0IYG7BJZ"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"GV Založba"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pokojnine"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pokojninsko zavarovanje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pravna ureditev"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"(Ne)dopustnost ponovne odmere pokojnine|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"It may occur in practice that facts which would enhance a pension calculation basis and also the amount of a pension, could be established only after the right to an old-age pension has been granted. Examples are equities or difference to a higher salary. The problem may occur, if such facts either existed before taking the decision, but the insured person was not acquainted with them, or are established after the deadline for the reopening of the proceedings, for instance by the decision of the court of law. It seems that in this respect the case law is not yet settled. Social Courts of distinctive levels, but also in time, change their argumentations. Changing case law of the courts and historical overview of legislative acts is presented in the article. It is analysed whether the decision regarding determination of pension level could become final and unchangeable, or could the continuance of the proceedings (or new proceedings) where new facts are taken into account also be admissible. It is argued that there are arguments for the possibility of new determination of the pension calculation basis. The strongest among them is property protection of the constitutionally recognised right to a pension. If contributions have been paid, they should be reflected in the calculation of a pension"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"V praksi se dogaja, da se po priznanju pravice do starostne pokojnine ugotovijo dejstva, ob upoštevanju katerih bi bilo mogoče povečati pokojninsko osnovo in s tem obseg pravice do pokojnine. Gre lahko za izplačilo plače v obliki delnic ali izplačila razlike v plači. Težava lahko nastane, ker so dejstva nastala bodisi pred časom odločanja, vendar zavarovanec z njimi ni bil seznanjen, bodisi po preteku roka za obnovo postopka, recimo na podlagi poznejše odločitve sodišča. Zdi se, da sodna praksa glede tega še ni ustaljena, saj socialna sodišča različnih stopenj, pa tudi časovno gledano, upoštevajo različne argumente. Po prikazu spreminjajoče se sodne prakse in krajšem zgodovinskem pregledu zakonodaje je analizirano, ali je mogoče zagovarjati pravnomočnost odločbe o višini pokojninske osnove kot elementa pri določanju obsega pravice do pokojnine ali dopustiti nadaljevanje postopka v obliki neprave obnove z upoštevanjem (novih) dejstev oziroma začetek novega postopka. Ugotovljeno je, da obstajajo argumenti za dopustnost ponovne odmere pokojnine. Najmočnejši med njimi je lastninskopravno varstvo ustavne pravice do pokojnine, saj se morajo plačani prispevki odražati v pokojninski osnovi"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-0IYG7BJZ","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-0IYG7BJZ"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-0IYG7BJZ/37ce2-5c4ca86404e7ed94c8f-e65-03c28-/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-0IYG7BJZ/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-0IYG7BJZ"}}}}