684 KB0 KB196520252020Prunč, Erichletnik:57številka:posebnastr. 127-134, 173ISSN:0040-3598COBISSID_HOST:36653661URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-07AF786YslVisoka šola za politične vedeTeorija in praksaHistorical developmentJezikovna politikaLanguage policySlovene languageSlovenščinaZgodovinski razvojVeliki čudež malega jezika|With Slovenia's entry to the EU in May 2004, Slovenian became one of the EU's 21 official languages, a figure that has now grown to 23. This meant that for the first time in history, the entire autochthonous language area found itself within the same legal framework. Only the Slovenian minority in Istria and social and political emigrants outside Europe remained outside this framework. In the linguistic-political framework of the EU, Slovenian has experienced its most extensive functional expansion. Against this background, I seek to outline the centrifugal and centripetal forces in the formation of a common (literary) language and culture. In so doing, I will not quote new factographic data, nor will I repeat generally known findings; instead, I will attempt to change the perspective on selected linguistic and culturological facts. Rather than a mental concept focused on finding original purity, monolinguism and unidirectionality in development, I bring to the fore the dynamic relationships of intercultural diversity, regional transience and the mutual interweaving of diverse elements. Unfortunately, within this framework I will be unable to pursue all of the complexities of development and, in the interest of greater clarity, I cannot avoid certain simplificationsMaja 2004 je s pristopom Slovenije EU postala slovenščina eden njenih 21, danes 23 uradnih jezikov. S tem se je prvič v zgodovini znašlo vse avtohtono jezikovno področje v istem pravnem okviru. Zunaj je ostala samo slovenska manjšina v Istri ter socialna in politična emigracija zunaj Evrope. V jezikovnopolitičnem okviru EU je doživela slovenščina svojo največjo funkcijsko razširitev. S tem ozadjem bi rad orisal sredobežne in sredotežne sile pri oblikovanju skupnega (knjižnega) jezika in kulture. Pri tem ne bom navajal novih faktografskih podatkov in ne bom ponavljal splošno znanih ugotovitev, ampak skušal spremeniti perspektivo na izbrana jezikoslovna in kulturološka dejstva. V nasprotju z miselnim konceptom, ki se je osredotočal na iskanje izvirne čistosti, enojezičnosti in enosmernosti v razvoju, bi postavil v ospredje dinamične odnose medkulturne pestrosti, regionalne prehodnosti in vzajemnega prepletanja raznorodnih prvin. Žal v tem okviru ne bom mogel slediti vsej zapletenosti razvoja in se zaradi večje nazornosti tudi ne bom mogel izogniti določenim poenostavitvamTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede