<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-02QHHNX3</identifier><date>2020</date><creator>Poggi, Francesca</creator><relation>documents/doc/0/URN_NBN_SI_doc-02QHHNX3_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/0/URN_NBN_SI_doc-02QHHNX3_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">40</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 9-26, 127</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1581-7652</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID_HOST">76007939</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-02QHHNX3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher publisher_location="Kranj">Klub Revus</publisher><source>Revus (Ljubljana)</source><rights>BY-SA</rights><subject language_type_id="eng">conversational implicatures</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">govorčev namen</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">legal interpretation</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">legislative intent</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">pogovorne implikacije</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">pravno razlaganje</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">speaker`s meaning</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">zakonodajni namen</subject><title>Against the conversational model of legal interpretation</title><title>on the difference between legislative intent and speaker`s intention</title></Record>