{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ZFK4QQ35/65d06bd2-01d6-4c2a-9f01-432193fbfd70/PDF","dcterms:extent":"1738 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ZFK4QQ35/8e43b62f-4a8b-4ef9-8047-0c99936bf335/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"82 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2024","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2024"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ZFK4QQ35","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-CFT6PFGK"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pravnik"}],"dcterms:issued":"2014","dc:creator":"Turičnik, Edita","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:69"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:9/10"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 603-630, 689-690"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0032-6976","COBISSID:14032977","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZFK4QQ35"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza društev pravnikov Slovenije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"European Union"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Evropska unija"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"odločanje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pristojnosti"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"sodišča"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2024"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Legal consequences for not referring a question for preliminary ruling|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"According to decentralized character of the EU legal system, national courts are the ordinary courts in matters of EU law and should as such guarantee effective legal protection of individual's rights deriving from EU law. To ensure uniform application of EU law provisions and especially to prevent possible divergent interpretations, a preliminary ruling procedure was created, found in Article 267 TFEU. On the basis of the mentioned Article national courts may, and sometimes must, refer a question to the CJEU and ask for clarification of the meaning or review of the validity of an act of EU law, which is of relevance to the case upon which national courts need to adjudicate, since the CJEU has an exclusive monopoly of interpretation on questions of EU law. This Paper first shortly examines, when national courts have the right and when the duty to refer question to the CJEU and which are exceptions to this obligation, but the main topic of the paper is focused on the possible legal consequences which may follow, if national courts do not fulfil their obligations under Article 267 TFEU. The author concludes, that those possible remedies are indeed able to strengthen the principles of primacy and effectiveness of EU law; notwithstanding, they should not be considered as an alternative for preliminary ruling proceedings"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Glede na decentraliziran značaj pravnega reda EU, so vsa nacionalna sodišča držav članic EU hkrati redna sodišča v zadevah prava EU in morajo kot taka zagotoviti učinkovito pravno varstvo pravic posameznikov, ki za slednje izhajajo iz prava EU. Z namenom, da se tudi v postopkih pred nacionalnimi sodišči zagotovi poenotena uporaba prava EU in zlasti, da se prepreči morebitna različna razlaga določb prava EU, je v členu 276 PDEU določen postopek za predhodno odločanje. Na podlagi omenjenega člena nacionalna sodišča lahko (in v določenih primerih morajo) Sodišču EU predložiti vprašanje v predhodno odločanje ter v njem zaprositi za razlago pomena ali odločitev o veljavnosti pravne norme EU, saj je Sodišče EU izključno pristojno, da o tem odloča. V predmetnem prispevku je najprej na kratko pojasnjeno, kdaj obstaja pravica in kdaj dolžnost nacionalnih sodišč, da postavijo vprašanje za predhodno odločanje in katere so izjeme od te dolžnosti. Glavna tema prispevka pa je osredotočena na možna pravna sredstva, ki lahko sledijo, če nacionalna sodišča ne spoštujejo svoje obveznosti iz člena 267 PDEU. Avtorica zaključi z ugotovitvijo, da obravnavana pravna sredstva sicer lahko okrepijo načelo primarnosti in učinkovitosti prava EU, vendar jih vseeno ne bi smeli obravnavati kot alternativo postopku predhodnega odločanja"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ZFK4QQ35","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ZFK4QQ35"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ZFK4QQ35/65d06bd2-01d6-4c2a-9f01-432193fbfd70/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ZFK4QQ35/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ZFK4QQ35"}}}}