226 KB0 KB198420252025Kirn, Galštevilka:108/109letnik:41str. 75-97ISSN:0352-3608DOI:10.51936/dr.41.108-109.75-97COBISSID_HOST:260676611URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y240CLJ3enFakulteta za družbene vedeSlovensko sociološko društvoDružboslovne razpraveabsence of violencecancellation of debtEnzo Traversoindebted subjectmarksistične spominske študijemarxist memory studiesmemory economyodpis dolgovodsotnost nasiljaprimitive accumulation of memoryprimitivna akumulacija spominaremembrance of debtspominjanje dolgaspominska ekonomijazadolžena subjektivnostA contribution to marxist memory studies| the structural need of capital to forget violence and eternally remember debt|The text departs from Traverso’s hypothesis concerning the impossibility of Marxism and Memory Studies encountering each other, and juxtaposes it with a few theoretical areas in Marx that may be useful for contributing to Marxist Memory Studies. The dialectical relationship within capitalism between the structurally necessary forgetting of violence and the structural remembering of debt is described before the concept of the primitive accumulation of capital and Lazzarato’s (2013) crucial notion of indebted subjectivity is deployed. The moral and memorial aspects of debt have been often overlooked by Marxism, while the relationship of memory to debt and capital has been completely ignored by the majority of memory-studies scholars. In the conclusion, it is argued that this missing link provides fertile grounds for Marxist Memory Studies and for furthering debates, especially on the topics of reparation, restitution, and debt cancellationBesedilo izhaja iz hipoteze Enza Traversa o nemogočem srečanju med marksizmom in študijami spomina ter v nasprotju s tem poda serijo teoretskih točk v Marxu, ki bi lahko bile koristne za marksistične študije spomina. Postavi začetne koordinate za mišljenje dialektičnega razmerja med strukturno nujno pozabo nasilja in strukturno nujnim spominjanjem dolga v kapitalizmu. Članek si pomaga tako s konceptom primitivne akumulacije kapitala kot z Lazzaratovim (2013) konceptom zadolženega subjekta. Moralni in spominski vidik dolga je marksizem pogosto spregledal, ravno tako kot so študije spomina vprašanja in razmerje spomina do dolga in kapitala pogosto ignorirale. Besedilo ugotavlja, da je prav ta odsotna povezava lahko plodno mesto za marksistične študije spomina, zlasti za nadaljnje prispevke k temi reparacije in odpisa dolgaTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlovensko sociološko društvo