345 KB0 KB192120252024Žalec, Bojanštevilka:4letnik:84str. 757-770ISSN:0006-5722DOI:10.34291/BV2024/04/ZalecCOBISSID_HOST:220565507URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-XTL3WA6CslTeološka fakultetaBogoslovni vestnikabductionabdukcijaArtificial Intelligencebig sciencecommon senseexternalism of intelligencegeneralityintuicijaintuitionparticularity of intelligencepartikularnost inteligenceprobability of humanlike artificial intelligenceprobability of superintelligencesplošnostumetna inteligencavelika znanostverjetnost človeški podobne umetne inteligenceverjetnost superinteligencezdravi razumzunanjostnost inteligenceČloveški podobna umetna inteligenca in superinteligenca| verjetnost in glavne težave njunega oblikovanja| Human-like artificial intelligence and superintelligence| the probability and main challenges of their design|The author deals with the question of the probability of the emergence of humanlike artificial intelligence and the emergence of superintelligence. He argues that no emergence is probable. The probability of the first is rejected, following Erik J. Larson's argumentation based on the essential characteristics of human intelligence. These include generality, intuition, common sense, and abduction. The probability of the onset of superintelligence is rejected based on arguments provided by François Chollet, emphasizing the non-generality, situationality and contextuality, and externalism of intelligence. The author demonstrates the importance of a correct understanding of the concept of intelligence and its definition. Misunderstanding can have negative effects far beyond the academic realm, including unjustified financial gains and damage in terms of organizing scientific work (big science, hive science), and fostering conditions for creativityAvtor se ukvarja z vprašanjem verjetnosti nastanka umetne inteligence, podobne človeški, in nastanka superinteligence. Trdi, da ni verjeten nastop nobene. Verjetnost prve zavrne na podlagi argumentacije Erika J. Larsona, ki temelji na bistvenih značilnostih človeške inteligence, kot so splošnost, intuicija, zdravi razum in abdukcija. Verjetnost nastanka superinteligence zavrne na podlagi argumentov Françoisa Cholleta, ki poudarja ne-splošnost, situacijskost in kontekstualnost ter zunanjostnost inteligence. Avtor poudarja pomembnost pravilnega razumevanja pojma inteligence ter njene ustrezne opredelitve. Napačno razumevanje ima lahko negativne učinke, ki presegajo akademsko področje - vključno z neupravičenimi finančnimi dobički ter škodo pri organiziranju znanstvenega dela (velika znanost, znanost panja) in spodbujanju pogojev za ustvarjalnostTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Teološka fakulteta