215 KB57 KB2025Mišič, Lukaštevilka:2/3letnik:25str. 235-256ISSN:1580-6316COBISSID:235909891URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-X1MP4E6WslInštitut za delo, Pravna fakultetaDelavci in delodajalciconscientious objectionDelovno pravodelovno razmerjeemployment relationshipequal treatmentetikafreedom of conscienceosebna prepričanjapersonal beliefsSlovenijaSvoboda vestiugovor vestiUgovor vesti| med osebnim imperativom in svobodo vesti ter delovnimi obveznostmi|The recent amendment to the Pharmacy Services Act, which abolished the right to conscientious objection for pharmacists, has reignited professional and public debate concerning this constitutional right. The right to conscientious objection, which is regulated by the lex generalis Health Services Act and recognised in the context of military service and defence, is now explicitly addressed with respect to pharmaceutical services. This legislative development has aligned pharmacists, as a professional group, with physicians, for whom the right to conscientious objection is regulated by the sector-specific Medical Services Act. However, pharmacists now also find themselves in a significantly different legal position compared to physicians and other healthcare professionals, as their lex specialis statutory legislation explicitly prohibits the exercise of conscientious objection for their profession. This raises numerous constitutional and legal issues and broader questions regarding the relationship between employees’ professional obligations and other personal duties within the employment context. It also focuses on various dimensions of the conduct of employees and employers concerning conscientious objection and the broader concept of freedom of conscience and pluralistic workplace environmentsNedavna sprememba Zakona o lekarniški dejavnosti (ZLD- 1D), ki je ukinila pravico do ugovora vesti za farmacevtske strokovne delavce, je oživila strokovno in splošno razpravo o tej ustavni pravici. Pravica do ugovora vesti, ki je splošno urejena v Zakonu o zdravstveni dejavnosti (ZZDej), srečamo pa jo še na področju vojaške službe oziroma obrambe države, je zdaj izrecno urejena tudi za farmacevtske strokovne delavce, s čimer so se ti kot poklicna skupina izenačili s poklicno skupino zdravnikov, za katere je ugovor vesti urejen v zanje področnem zakonu, in sicer Zakonu o zdravniški službi (ZZdrS).3 Vendar pa se lekarniški delavci v razmerju do zdravnikov in drugih zdravstvenih delavcev po novem nahajajo v pomembno drugačnem položaju, saj je ZLD-1D uveljavljanje ugovora vesti zanje izrecno prepovedal. To odpira številna (ustavno)pravna vprašanja, ne nazadnje pa tudi vprašanja o razmerju med delovnimi in drugimi obveznostmi delavcev v delovnem razmerju, ki segajo onkraj področja zdravstvene dejavnosti, oziroma različne vidike ravnanja delavca in delodajalca v zvezi z ugovorom vesti in širše ustavne kategorije svobodo vesti ter pluralnih delovnih okolijTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaInštitut za delo pri Pravni fakulteti Univerze v Ljubljani