<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WV01FST9/61391b15a-b6c840-92aca347--d4f34c9ee/PDF"><dcterms:extent>297 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WV01FST9/dbd31630-bac8-4012-af7a-f5b123e9e6ff/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>37 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2013-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2013</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WV01FST9"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-2XUGOISV" /><dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Strnad, Igor</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:46</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 74-87</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0353-6521</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:17171793</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-WV01FST9</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Lexpera</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Podjetje in delo</dcterms:isPartOf><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2013-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Dopuščena revizija| analiza primera|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">With the latest civil procedure reform in Slovenia, the "leave to appeal" system is the only form of this legal remedy. Only the Supreme Court is entitled to choose the case, it may omit reasons for denying leave to appeal, and to determine the issue. The aim is that the Supreme Court judges should fully devote their capacities to the cases, and to deliver diligent reasoning and explanation. But they are bound by constitutional and legal provisions. On the merits of the particular case, the author is analysing their adherence to these provisions</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">S sprejemom zadnje spremembe pravdnega postopka je dopuščena revizija edina oblika tega izrednega pravnega sredstva. Le Vrhovno sodišče je tisto, ki odloča o izbiri zadeve, ki jo bo obravnavalo; zavrnitve predloga mu ni treba obrazložiti; sámo si tudi določi vprašanje. S tem je omogočeno, da se sodniki Vrhovnega sodišča polno posvetijo zadevam, ki jih sprejmejo v obravnavo, ter da jih skrbno preštudirajo in obrazložijo. Vendar tudi v tem postopku veljajo omejitve ustavnopravne in zakonske narave. Z analizo konkretnega primera avtor ugotavlja njihovo upoštevanje</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WV01FST9"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WV01FST9" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WV01FST9/61391b15a-b6c840-92aca347--d4f34c9ee/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WV01FST9/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WV01FST9" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>