<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WTLVH7OC/31c3317d-52a1-4f15-9c75-f05b3413cd88/HTML"><dcterms:extent>72 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WTLVH7OC/1302fff2-a2f9-4ca2-8f98-8266922743f7/PDF"><dcterms:extent>1737 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WTLVH7OC/5e3feddf-0457-4445-b3fc-3b583a2fc7e0/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>61 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1978-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1978</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WTLVH7OC"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-EVBFLKN7" /><dcterms:issued>2006</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Kernev-Štrajn, Jelka</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">20 strani</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:29</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 93-102 + 265-274</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0351-1189</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:5583390</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-WTLVH7OC</dc:identifier><dc:language>fr</dc:language><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovensko društvo za primerjalno književnost</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Primerjalna književnost</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">literarna teorija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">literary theory</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Romanticism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">romantika</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Schlegel, Friedrich</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">žanri</dc:subject><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q459381" /><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1978-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Žanr kot odsotnost žanra| Le genre comme l'absence de genre|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The premise of this article is that hybridization (understood as a special blend of theoretical and literary discourse) has asserted itself most strongly in the fragmentary form of modernist and, above all, postmodernist writing. Despite numerous transformations, it is still evident that this is tied to the romantic fragment by more than may be apparent at first glance. It therefore seems that the romantic fragment deserves special attention: viewed from today's postmodern perspective, it caused a revolution in the conception of the relationship between philosophy and literature, and between theoretical and poetic language. Romantic thinking revolved incessantly around a task that could not be completed: to create a perfect, universal work of art, the genre of which remained an enigma. In concrete works of art this genre would be present in the mode of absence. The fragment should figure as the embodiment of this absence. The fragment, be it romantic or modern, is therefore a paradoxical form: it is a literary genre and at the same time it is not. Perhaps this is what makes the fragment so suitable for observing the two-hundred-year process of intersection and coexistence of poetic and theoretical discourse</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Članek zagovarja stališče, da se hibridizacija (razumljena kot poseben spoj teoretičnega in literarnega diskurza) ni nikjer uveljavila tako zelo kot ravno v fragmentarni obliki modernistične in predvsem postmodernistične literature. Tej se kljub številnim transformacijam pozna, da jo z romantičnim fragmentom veže več, kot je videti na prvi pogled. Zato si romantični fragment zasluži posebno pozornost. Saj je, gledano z današnje perspektive, povzročal revolucijo v pojmovanju razmerja med filozofijo in literaturo, med teoretičnim in pesniškim govorom. Romantično mišljenje se je nenehno vrtelo okoli neizpolnjene naloge, ustvariti popolno, univerzalno umetniško delo. Ta hipotetična oblika, katere žanr je še zmeraj uganka, naj bi bila v posameznih umetninah prisotna na način odsotnosti. Fragment naj bi utelešal to odsotnost</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WTLVH7OC"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WTLVH7OC" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WTLVH7OC/1302fff2-a2f9-4ca2-8f98-8266922743f7/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Slovensko društvo za primerjalno književnost</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WTLVH7OC/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WTLVH7OC" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>